Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Overcast ~ 25°F  
River stage: 23.46 Rising
Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2010
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (12) Share link

After three years, Tour of Missouri faces uncertain future

Monday, September 14, 2009
(Photo)
Cyclists headed down a hill on Route B during Stage 2 of the Tour of Missouri Tuesday afternoon, September 8, 2009, in Southeast Missouri.
(Kit Doyle)
[Click to enlarge]
From the cacophony of foreign languages along the 112-mile route to Cape Girardeau to the rapt spectators lining downtown streets, it was clear that big-time international sports had arrived in small-town Missouri.

Playing the part of conquering hero: Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, who welcomed the 2009 Tour of Missouri's second-day stage last week in the city his family has called home for six generations.

In the VIP hospitality tent and atop the medal ceremony stage, Kinder basked in the glow of a cycling race that has quickly become a destination for the world's top riders.

But a hint of desperation tinged the celebrations. After three years and $6 million of state support, the race has yet to lure a corporate title sponsor -- a shortcoming that could prove fatal.

"I need your help to make sure we have a 2010 Tour of Missouri," Kinder told the estimated 5,000 fans who watched the Sept. 8 stage. Minutes later, he repeated the plea.

As recently as July, the race's immediate future was in doubt. Gov. Jay Nixon's administration froze the tour's $1.5 million tourism allocation before relenting in the face of pressure from biking boosters and the state's Tourism Commission, which Kinder leads.

Left unspoken are the race's political overtones.

Kinder, the only Republican holding a statewide executive office, is widely considered Nixon's top GOP challenger in 2012.

And the tour, which lasts for one week, allows the lieutenant governor to boost his name recognition on a two-wheeled barnstorming ride across Missouri.

Stops on this year's event include St. Louis and Kansas City as well as smaller towns such as Chillicothe, Farmington, Rolla and Sedalia. Previous stops included Clinton, Springfield, Branson and Columbia.

Nixon, by contrast, had no plans to attend the race. Asked about its future during a visit last week to the Ford Motor Co.'s Kansas City Assembly Plant, the governor was noncommittal.

"We'll see," he said. "This is year three of a three-year contract. I think we'll analyze what it's done and see relative to what we can do where our investments lie."

Budget documents provided to The Associated Press show a total of $1.344 million in corporate sponsorship for the 2009 race from companies such as Drury Hotels Co., Edward Jones Financial Cos. and Emerson Electric Co.

Missing from the top tier of sponsors is Monsanto, the St. Louis-based agribusiness that donated at least $100,000 last year but chose not to participate again. Emerson, a St. Louis-based technology company, trimmed its donation this year by half.

"I have worked three years to get a title sponsor and found many ways to fail," Kinder said, paraphrasing a Thomas Jefferson quote. "I'm going to keep working until we succeed."

The absence of a title sponsor doomed the 2009 Tour of Georgia after six previous annual races. Tour of Missouri competition director John Gatch served in a similar capacity at the Georgia races. He even inadvertently referred to the defunct race while moderating a news conference with Stage 2 winner Mark Cavendish before correcting the mistake.

A longtime competitive cyclist, he has also worked at the Kent Tour of China and the Tour du Pont -- two high-profile races from the 1990s that no longer exist.

"Races do come and go, but we'd like to go on," he said. "We're not planning on its demise. We're not looking at the end game, we're looking at what we can do to make it bigger."

Even the most optimistic Tour of Missouri boosters concede that despite the hype, cycling remains a niche spectator sport even in this country's bicycling hotbeds -- let alone a state flush with competitive NFL football, Major League Baseball and NCAA Division I teams.

That hasn't kept the Tour of Missouri from luring the sport's top teams with little trouble -- excluding Lance Armstrong, who emerged from retirement this year but passed on the event after a third-place finish in the Tour de France. Seven teams that participated in the recent French tour -- including Astana, Armstrong's most recent squad -- opted for the Missouri race over top events the same week in Spain and Britain.

"There's great excitement about this race," said Mark Cavendish, a British sprinter who won the tour's first two stages before exiting the race Thursday because of a respiratory infection. "I always feel welcome here."

The Missouri race began under former governor Matt Blunt, who embraced a proposal by Cary Summers, a prominent Springfield businessman and avid cyclist.

Along with the $1.5 million annual tourism fund contribution, the race -- which is operated bnot-for-profitor-profit corporation -- received another $500,000 from the Missouri Development Finance Board. That share comes from fees generated by the agency's programs, not tax revenue.

The tourism fund contributed $1.7 million to last year's race, and $1.45 million in the inaugural year. The finance board provided $500,000 last year and $350,000 in 2007.

Two blocks from the finish line in downtown Cape Girardeau, business owners Roger and Judith Anne Lang stood idly while the expected crowds of 30,000 race-day visitors failed to materialize.

Their sidewalk jewelry booth had attracted few shoppers. But the couple nonetheless eagerly embraced the race and its accompanying focus Southeast Missouri Missouri -- if only for a fleeting afternoon.

"Maybe they'll see we're alive and vibrant," Judith Anne Lang said, referring to potential customers more inclined to shop at the local mall than visit downtown. "In that respect, we couldn't buy that kind of publicity."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

At a time when there are so many vital things we need to spend tax dollars on, it is worth noting that Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder is so out of touch with fiscal responsibility that he would push to have this race in the first place. It was a smart move for Nixon to let Kinder have his way with this year's race so that we could all see the wasteful spending of this potential candidate for our state's highest office.

-- Posted by my_thoughts on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 10:10 AM

So the state put in a total of 2 million dollars (assuming this includes police etc), I think it is safe to assume the economic impact of the Tour was more than that, maybe not 30 or 40 million, but I'd think it gives a pretty good ROI for a meager 8 or 10 million. I know myself alone spent at least $200 going to stl for stage 1 and then ste gen, p-ville, and cape for stage 2.

Besides a cycling cap probably fits in the mail box as good, if not better then a John Deere hat, so let us talk about federal subsidize or how the conversation err conservation department operates unchecked by the citizenry.

Now can someone please pass me the high fructose corn syrup and i'll need some of the that ethanol for my prius.

-- Posted by random on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 10:27 AM

Random:

its amazing how people get so bent out of shape about the state spending 1.5 mil from taxes on an event that generates revenue for the entire state. Newsflash: the board of tourism spends our tax dollars to promote missouri. How much did the state give away for the Cards to build that new stadium? Sorry, but 1.5 mil this year to promote missouri and generate econimic activity doesn't strike me as waste.

-- Posted by Ike on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 10:37 AM

40 million on ROI? Where is the math on that?"while the expected crowds of 30,000 race-day visitors failed to materialize." So is the crowds did not show up were did the 40 million come from?

-- Posted by Airborne 95B on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 11:05 AM

I think people actually go to Cardinal games.

-- Posted by grandma72 on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 12:09 PM

wow picked up by forbes

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/09/1...

also it is intresting to type in 'tour of missouri' into google and hit news. Let's see we have stories in:

Reuters India

Sky Sports

reuters

espn

the canadian press

new york times

abc news

eTaiwan news

seatle times

BBC

etc

I think the tourism board got there 1.5 million dollars worth of advertising...but forget that lets do tv spots and billboards and tell everyone about Branson.

-- Posted by random on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 1:33 PM

IKE could not agree more.

Airborne- estimated to be 30-40 million by Medalist Corp not by Gov't and my point is: even if it is quarter or a third of the estimated 30 million well it is still a great return on investment, but that shouldn't even be an issue because the tourism board job is to promote missouri and i think the easily got the 1.5 million dollars worth plus the added bonus of the economic impact...maybe not for Cape Girardeau, but for STL, KC, Rolla, SEdalia etc...maybe next time just don't come to Cape b/c if we want entertainment well go watch the tractor pull and there ain't nothing wrong with that either.

-- Posted by random on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 1:42 PM

I think the event is worth the money as well. There was not a huge turnout in Cape (the 5,000 police estimate may have been a bit high) but Cape kind of got hosed on the dates. St. Lou get Labor day and we get the day after Labor day.

I rather enjoyed the event as something different for this area. So what if it was overhyped and the economic impact not what one would hope. You have to build from the ground up.

-- Posted by shortwhitebaldguy on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 3:56 PM

You sold me shortwhitebaldguy. After all said a done it was kinda cool. People are going to complain about the state or federal government spending money no matter what it's spent on.

It was cool that it was in Cape.....this year.

-- Posted by grandma72 on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 9:20 PM

Judging by the way most of you people do math, it has become very clear to me just why this country's economy is in the toilet.

Missouri didn't get the 10, 20 30, 40 million or however much was actually generated. They got 4.225% of it, thats it - thats all she wrote! Just the sales tax and nothing more.

$47,337,300 worth of ADDITIONAL spending would give us less than a buck profit on our $2,000,000 investment. I say additional spending because people are going to spend a given amount of money, race or no race. Unless this thing caused people to spend money they were not going to spend somewhere else in Missouri, we made nothing additional off of them.

Maybe it was fun, maybe some businesses made money, and maybe it was good advertisement. But what it wasn't, was profitable for Missouri.

Three years of losing money is enough. If you want a bike race go out and get the private sponsorship ( a great ROI sells itself) and leave the government out of it.

-- Posted by malan on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, at 10:03 PM

Go to St. Louis and see how many people from Ill., Ark., Miss., and other states go to cardinal ballgames. Spend money on food,gas,motels,shopping, etc. Look at all the state sales tax people spent in Missouri just because of the Cardinals. I bet the state brings in more money in one week from the cardinal fans, than they did in 3 years of the Tour of Missouri. The state will recover many times over their investment in the Cardinals new ballpark. And lets not forget the refurbishing of the ballpark in Kansas City, that the state is involve in thru state funding. Great tax revenue investments for the state.

-- Posted by retired1 on Tue, Sep 15, 2009, at 10:56 AM

well, just time that bike race with the 100-mile yard sale...That would be great!!! Plenty of folks on the roadside...

Bike racing in the United States is not, and may never be, a spectator sport.

-- Posted by jacksonjazzman on Tue, Sep 15, 2009, at 12:09 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: