|
|
Partly Cloudy ~ River stage: 33.99 Rising Saturday, November 21, 2009 |
Ugly? Think federal aidWednesday, July 1, 2009The subject is disabilities. The problem is fraud. Before I travel beyond this point, let me clearly state that I have long been an outspoken advocate for those with disabilities. I've had the privilege of working with children with disabilities through the Kenny Rogers Children's Center for many, many years. I recognize the obstacles of the disabled and as a former member of the Governor's Council on Literacy, I have worked to dismantle barriers in terms of the disabled and education. But, at the same time, I also know that far too many people in this country receive disability benefits who are no more disabled than I. I have "disabled" people constantly offering to work for cash to avoid any interruption in their disability checks. And don't tell me to report these people. I have. Disruptive children who cause issues in the classroom are eligible for SSI, a form of disability benefit. And, if you have the time, look up the number of SSI recipients. It's both amazing and frightening. A new report that surfaced this week shows a growing momentum to classify obesity as a form of disability. The compassionate among us see this as a form of much-needed assistance. The cynical among us see this as a growing trend toward more top-heavy government tax dollars growing the dependent base in this country. So in following with that trend, I offer a new class of disability: the ugly. Yes, that's right, ugly people suffer from a unique form of disability. Study after study confirms that less pleasant appearing people are at a disadvantage in the workplace. Like it or not, our society rewards the attractive and penalizes the ugly. That puts those homely folk at a distinct disadvantage. Clearly they should fall into the category of the disabled. The current administration's obsession with leveling the playing field of society is missing a golden opportunity. By carving out this new category of disability, there's no telling just how many people can share in the wealth because of the lousy cards they were dealt. By my unscientific observation, half of Arkansas would qualify. If unruly children and those whose diet routine is solely fast food can qualify as disabled, then surely the ugly have room for argument. Oh sure, there are lots of details yet to be finalized but the handsome-challenged have a strong case to make for their disabilities. So I strongly suggest that all you who are ugly -- and you know who you are -- write your congressman today. There's ample federal dollars available for the taking. P.S. I have already submitted my request for funding under the Ugly Americans Act of 2009. If you qualify, join me. After all, we aren't getting any prettier! Comments |
Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists:
|
Momma always said, "Pretty is as pretty does." I've read many of your op-eds and dude you 'are' ugly!
As usual, Mr. Jensen, a clever, humorous spin on a serious subject.
Seriously though: However did it come about that children were deemed eligible for this ... that should never, ever have been done. Wasn't the basic purpose of SSI to provide an income to people who were too disabled work, but were ineligble for SS Disability due to not having earned enough 'credits' to qualify? Since children generally are not employable ...
One more example of how a government program has grown beyond its primary purpose (or justification) ... with another being the EIC changes over the years.
Unfortunately, I don't believe I would qualify for SSI under the Ugly Americans Act ... laughing~
A nice light hearted perspective on a serious issue that I deal with on a daily basis. I try to help those disabled teengaers "overcome" their disbaility by providing training and direct instruction on BASIC skills like peronal hygiene, punctuality, approriate dress, initiative, vocabulary, etc. Many times, the parents fight this education every step of the way because they do not want their child to lose any SSI money. If the parent was receptive to instruction themselves, they would know that SSi does not vanish when the child becomes employed. There is a spend down formula to help wean people off the system. How do you teach pride and quality of life to young adults when everyday they see their parents telling them NOT to do anything. Of course not all parents are like this, but I've dealt with my share of them. I hope we're making headway and I'm not doing all this work for naught.
"Study after study confirms that less pleasant appearing people are at a disadvantage in the workplace. Like it or not, our society rewards the attractive and penalizes the ugly. That puts those homely folk at a distinct disadvantage. Clearly they should fall into the category of the disabled. "
This goes beyond peronal hygiene, punctuality, approriate dress, initiative, vocabulary, etc. I see ugly discrimination all the time in the workplace. I do agree with gurusmom - disability should only go to those that are unable to work. But in many workplaces, layoffs conveniently miss the cute girls. hmmmm....yeah in many cases it goes way beyond their looks, and I'm not talking about their productivity or intelligence either. Still, ugly people are not promoted and are often overlooked. I have even witnessed reverse discrimination in this area as well....I worked for an IT company looking to hire an Analyst. An offer was being prepared to an individual who happened to be an attractive looking female with strong credentials and experience in a male dominated industry. After the hiring manager prepared the offer and routed it to HR, the head of HR (who was a lady) nixed it citing the following reason: the candidate would pose too much of a disruption in the work environment.