Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 42°F  
River stage: 33.45 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (10) Share link

Unlicensed dog breeders targeted by Missouri initiative

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

(Photo)
Missouri Department of Agriculture director Jon Hagler speaks at a news conference Monday with Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster about Prosecution Bark Alert.
(Fred Lynch)
[Click to enlarge] [Order this photo]
On Monday, the Missouri Attorney General's Office and the Missouri Department of Agriculture unveiled the second part of a statewide initiative to crack down on unlicensed dog breeders.

Coined "Prosecution Bark Alert," the initiative works to identify and prosecute previously identified unlicensed breeding facilities, said Missouri Department of Agriculture director Jon Hagler at a news conference on the steps of the Cape Girardeau County Common Pleas Courthouse.

According to the guidelines established in 1992 by the department of agriculture, anyone who keeps on their premises three or more adult female dogs capable of reproducing must be a licensed breeder. Only breeders whose facilities fit the requirements to be considered a "hobby" are exempt from needing licensing.

To be considered a hobby under those guidelines, a breeder can have no more than 10 females, must participate in exhibits or dog shows, and cannot sell any dogs to a broker or pet store. A hobby breeder can only sell dogs to individual consumers or other breeders.

The unlicensed breeders problem in Missouri came about as a result of these regulations not being enforced and the issue being neglected for too long, said Attorney General Chris Koster.

"For a long time, the General Assembly turned a blind eye toward puppy mills," Koster said.

More than 2,000 dogs have been rescued so far as a result of the crackdown, many of them having suffered neglect and abuse at substandard facilities, Koster said.

In addition to often poor health conditions at unlicensed breeder facilities, such operations put properly licensed breeders at a competitive disadvantage, Hagler said.

The first part of "Bark Alert," enacted in February, focused on raising awareness and gathering information -- much of it in the form of anonymous tips -- about these breeders, Hagler said. Now the focus turns to eradicating those facilities through legal action, Hagler said.

"It'll put a lot more teeth in the Bark Alert," Hagler said.

Koster said investigations have already pinpointed seven cases of unlicensed breeding operations he thinks can be prosecuted. Penalties involve $1,000 fines per violation, a punishment that could get costly for an operation with 40-plus dogs, Hagler said.

bdicosmo@semissourian.com

388-3635


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Shut down these puppy mills!!!

-- Posted by Turnip on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 8:33 AM

Bark Alert? *sigh*

-- Posted by Megalomania on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 9:14 AM

The AG's office is worried about puppy mills. How about dealing with all the illegals in the state or Missouri being the meth capital of the U.S. Bark Alert*sigh and double sigh*

-- Posted by Airborne 95B on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 9:43 AM

To spite what you may think, this is an important program and goes hand-in-hand with the other issues you mention. Just like prosecuting child or elder abuse, a society can be pretty fairly judged by how it deals with it's most helpless members, be they animals or people.

There's a tremendous cost, both in dollars and the state's reputation as a puppy-mill capitol in dealing with these unwanted dogs. I'm tired of Missouri being the back-water of the US on this issue.

-- Posted by JohnnieCrunch on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 11:22 AM

Yeah, the AG's office should overlook illegal behavior. What a brilliant idea. The SEMO hillbillies strike again.

-- Posted by heye1967 on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 12:01 PM

Not to mention the fact that illegal immigration isn't even in the MO AG's jurisdiction. It's under the Feds. But hey, a hillbilly certainly won't let little things like knowledge, understanding and reality get in the way of making idiotic comments.

-- Posted by heye1967 on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 12:04 PM

This is a good start. But I hope the AG does not forget all the licensed breeders who have dogs in horrid conditions because the Dept of Ag inspectors are so lax.

And this will help to fight meth and drugs.

Because where you have puppy mills, you have dog fighting, and where you have dog fighting, you have drugs.

-- Posted by docksider21 on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 12:51 PM

heye1967: the AG is the head lawenforcement officer in Missouir and he can tell local office to start stepping up enforcement of all laws both federal and otherwise. Right now because of money Missouri is pushing the illegal problem off on the feds. Missouri should look to how the sheriff in Arizona treats illegals and all criminals. All becaus there is a puppy mill does not mean you have dog fighting. When is the last time anyone busted a poodle fighting ring?

-- Posted by Airborne 95B on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 2:02 PM

I never said overlook illegal behavior. It is all about the higher priority. What would you rather have the police investigate a murder/rape or someone jay-walking across the street.

-- Posted by Airborne 95B on Tue, Jun 30, 2009, at 2:17 PM

It really doesn't make sense to me. Seems to me the unwanted pet population has alot to do with irresponsible pet owners and not the breeders. Why attack breeders? Why not attack those who get and then get rid of their pets? The last thing a breeder wants to see is their babies in an animal shelter where all their hard work will be euthanized. We breeders can only sell what pet owners are willing to buy. We can not help that pet owners choose to get rid of their older pet for a cute little puppy. I myself have taken in quite a few adults because of irresponsible pet owners and have offered to help shelters find homes for their unwanted instead of euthanizing them. I've taken in several adults that were in bad shape and had vet treatment for them. They have a long road ahead of them yet. It's not fair to judge those who try to help the animals who will be in bad condition for a long time. It's never an overnight cure. I think any laws will only add to the unwanted pets. This is a scandal to end pet ownership and our kids will never enjoy what we have taken for granted and allowed to become law.

-- Posted by Chi on Sun, Jul 5, 2009, at 7:58 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: