[SeMissourian.com] Overcast ~ 62°F  
River stage: 22.77 ft. Falling
Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Losing a governor

Friday, June 26, 2009

South Carolina lost its governor this week.

No, Gov. Mark Sanford didn't die. He was, well, sort of misplaced for a few days.

He left on a Thursday and didn't tell anyone -- including his wife and four sons -- where he was going.

No itinerary. No security. No temporary handing over the reins of state government.

Just gone.

I suppose there have been times in all our lives when we'd like to check out of the daily grind for a while. For some of us, a 20-minute nap on a warm afternoon will do the trick. For others, a road trip is the cure. Or a visit to South America.

Governor Sanford has established a reputation for not turning up wherever it is everyone else thinks he ought to be.

In a way, I admire Sanford's independent streak. The notion that our lives have to be controlled, channeled, contained by obligations, particularly the ones others schedule for us, is wrong.

Freedom, my friends, is being able to say: "By golly, I don't have to eat All Bran for breakfast."

Sanford's leave of absence has political undertones. The governor has received a great deal of attention as being the governor who told Washington: Keep your stimulus funds. You can't afford to throw all that money around.

Not that his stand made him the most popular guy in South Carolina. The state legislature went to court to force Sanford to request $700 million in federal stimulus funding -- and won.

Curious thing about the stimulus money: The federal government virtually forces states to take the cash while, at the same time, requiring states to ask for it first. This is how government covers its tracks.

In addition, the South Carolina Legislature adjourned last week after overriding all of Sanford's 10 vetoes.

All in all, it was not a particularly good week for Sanford.

Sanford has been mentioned by some as a potential presidential candidate to challenge President Obama's bid for a second term.

And he was chairman of the Republican Governors Association -- until he resurfaced Wednesday and said he had been to Argentina to see the woman he has been having an affair with for at least a year.

If you were thinking of a presidential campaign, what things can you think of doing that would make your name a household word?

I've got it: Run away from home. Have an affair. Cry at your televised confession.

Don't tell me Mark Sanford is down for the count. I suggest he talk to Paris Hilton as a possible running mate.

Governor Sanford's absence caused quite a stir among the rest of South Carolina's officials, who didn't know who was in charge. It's a good thing for them that there appeared to be no need for a governor for several days.

This might be something other states could consider. Do we really need a governor 365 days a year?

Losing a governor for several days reminds me of the occasion, a few years ago, when the governor of Kansas was incapacitated and no one could find the lieutenant governor. In Kansas, the lieutenant governor has no duties other than succeeding the governor, if necessary.

Once it became apparent that (a) no one was sure where the lieutenant governor lived and (b) he wasn't there anyway, everyone in Kansas started playing Find the Lieutenant Governor. He eventually turned up.

More recently, the lieutenant governor of Kansas had to be found when Gov. Kathleen Sibelius became secretary of health and human services in the Obama administration. Someone had the foresight to find him before she accepted the appointment.


Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

You're right, Mr. Sullivan! Who really needs a full-time governor? Expand that thought to include other (elected) government employees maybe ...

However ... any employee should be held accountable for their 'time,' don't you think? If we're paying someone to be on the job, shouldn't we expect them to at least be present and accounted for, even if they don't exactly have to punch a time clock?

If Gov. Sanford just didn't show up for work, without letting his employers (the taxpayers) know that he was taking time off ... shouldn't he be held to the same standard as any private employee, who would have been fired on the spot for such a thing? Guess I believe the same about congress ... We pay you X-amount of dollars and we expect you to at least be present for x-amount of time (votes), or your pay will be docked or ...

-- Posted by gurusmom on Fri, Jun 26, 2009, at 7:42 PM

I'm withh you gurusmom. Crazy concewpt making somebody do their job!!

-- Posted by agape on Fri, Jun 26, 2009, at 10:17 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com or semoball.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.


Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Joe Sullivan
River City Journal