- Two men accused of selling meth to undercover cop (6/22/17)
- Police: Man grabbed wheel, tried to kill driver and himself in Jackson crash (6/23/17)
- Jackson scores high in survey of residents; better streets, Aldi are high priorities (6/20/17)4
- Cape man stabbed in head, arm after strip-club incident; skull fractured, police say (6/25/17)3
- Marble Hill mayor hires city manager without board approval (6/21/17)3
- Annual SEMO District Fair event lineup announced (6/23/17)1
- Two charged in theft of jewelry from Cape storage facility (6/23/17)1
- Oran town board fired officer before hiring him as police chief; city officials say they can't remember reason for firing (6/25/17)2
- Library provides free lunches this summer (6/19/17)
- Jackson School District giving away bricks from 'Old A' building (6/23/17)2
Plan targets nonpartisan courts
If there is a lesson to be learned from the current economic crisis, it is that we can either pay attention to what our government is doing or we will pay the price for not paying attention. In Jefferson City, our state legislators are considering House Joint Resolution 10, which is a proposal that is not receiving much attention. HJR 10 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would change everything about Missouri's renowned nonpartisan court plan except its name.
I am proud that our state is the birthplace of the nonpartisan court plan, the first merit-based judicial selection system in the country. This system has succeeded in giving us a fair and impartial justice system for almost three-quarters of a century. HJR 10 can be summed up in five words: a lot of bad ideas. It would help destroy the barriers that have protected our courts from partisan politics and special-interest money.
As a country, we were looking the other way while officials dismantled the regulations that kept our finance system safe from the excesses of greed and power. HJR 10 would dismantle a system that keeps our courts free from the excesses of politics and special-interest money. I urge Missourians to let their state legislators know that our method of selecting judges isn't broken and doesn't need the kind of political fix that HJR 10 would give it.
TOM BURKE, President, The Missouri Bar, St. Louis