![]() KIT DOYLE ~ kdoylesemissourian.com (Photo Illustration By Elizabeth Dodd) [Click to enlarge] |
Police investigators determined that just over half of those rapes were "unfounded" or that they never occurred. That number is six times higher than what is reported across the state, according to the highway patrol.
Rape is one of the most difficult crimes to investigate. The evidence often boils down to one person's word against another's, making rapes difficult to prove in court.
But when should reports of rapes be classified as "unfounded"? It's a question disputed nationwide, much of it boiling down to how individual departments record their unfounded rapes. Should a recanted statement prove that a rape didn't exist, even if the alleged victim may be scared or have been pressured by outside forces to let the case drop? What about cases where alleged victims had lied about certain portions of their statement? The determination of rape reports as unfounded appears to be mired in confusion and miscommunication that can lead to inaccurate reporting of crimes. National statistics vary wildly on how many rape cases are discarded.
![]() |
A 10-month Southeast Missourian investigation into unfounded rape claims throughout Southeast Missouri even surprised Cape Girardeau Police Department officials, who, alarmed at the high percentage of unfounded rapes, have since started new policies in rape cases. After repeated inquiries to the Missouri State Highway Patrol about its own unfounded rape statistics, a director of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program for the patrol suggested that the topic, previously off the radar, may be an issue highlighted at future training sessions.
So many discrepancies abound about the prevalence of false rape complaints that a 2006 Cambridge Law Journal article on the topic estimates that rates of unfounded cases range from 1.5 to 90 percent.
"This isn't something we only see in rural communities -- it's a problem in metropolitan areas, too," said Joanne Archambault, executive director of End Violence Against Women International.
The numbers
According to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, a nationwide organization founded by the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape, of the less than 10 percent of rape victims who report their assaults to police, only 3 to 8 percent of those turn out to be unfounded reports, based on a culmination of studies from other entities.
In 2008, about 8 percent of the forcible rapes reported to law enforcement agencies in Missouri were later cleared as "unfounded," according to Laurie Crawford, director of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program for the Missouri State Highway Patrol. That means that following an investigation, the crime is either found to not have occurred or to not have occurred in a manner that would legally constitute forcible rape, said Bill Welch, an auditor for highway patrol's records division.
"It's one of those things that you know when you see it," Welch said.
Cape Girardeau police chief Carl Kinnison, who says officers write up the cases "at face value," acknowledged the high numbers were surprising and suggested several possible explanations.
Following a recent UCR audit of its 25 rape cases reported in 2008, the department enacted a new policy: It will begin keeping cases open unless strong evidence supports the victim's recantation, Kinnison said.
"In the past, we were believing the victim if she says 'I lied,'" Kinnison said.
For 2008, however, the policy change did not affect the 13 unfounded cases among the 25 total reported for that year, Kinnison said, though it would have lowered the percentage for previous years.
Some departments may be taking reports of sexual assaults as other things, such as requests for service, and not reporting them as rape, accounting for a lower number of reported rapes that will then actually be turned over to detectives for investigation, Kinnison said.
Another factor that could contribute to 50 percent of Cape Girardeau's reported rapes being unfounded involves the thoroughness of the investigation, Kinnison said.
"The more efficient the department, the more unfoundeds you will see," he said.
Kinnison cited a widely publicized 1994 study by Purdue University sociology professor Dr. Eugene J. Kanin that determined 41 percent of forcible rape cases reported to a metropolitan Midwestern police department turned out to be false allegations.
Kanin argued that the more thorough investigations a department conducted, the greater chance they would have a higher number of unfounded cases.
A report recently issued by the American Prosecutors Research Institute, co-authored by Archambault, director of End Violence Against Women, harshly criticized Kanin's study because his conclusions were based on the findings of false allegations by the detectives of one department, Archambault said.
Kanin's study was not representative of the "real world" because the investigators in the study put pressure on the victims to recant their stories, said Wendy J. Murphy, a former prosecutor who specialized in rape cases and a professor at New England School of Law.
"Women were pressured to recant -- cops don't do that," Murphy said.
Murphy said in her 20-plus-year career, she'd never seen a false rape claim.
"It's not scientific, but it's not nothing," she said.
Scott County investigator Capt. Gregg Ourth said he hasn't seen many unfounded rape cases, and the few he has seen involved victims who may have suffered from mental illness.
The rural county reported no unfounded rapes of its six turned over to the highway patrol's records division over the past three years.
The Jackson Police Department reported that three of its seven reported rapes were unfounded following further investigation, and three of the Sikeston Department of Public Safety's 32 rape cases for the years 2006 through 2008 were unfounded, according to the state data.
"In my opinion, nothing is unfounded -- there's always something you can do with it," said Bollinger County investigator Stash Petton.
Petton said he'll take the investigation "as far as humanly possible." He cited one case where he knew a victim had reported several previous rapes that turned out to be false; the fourth time she reported a rape, the suspect she named confessed to deputies and was arrested.
According to the Uniform Crime Reports, designed to create a standard measure for crime data, in Jefferson City, Mo., with a population of 885 fewer people than Cape Girardeau, 60 forcible rapes were reported over the past three years and 8 percent of those were deemed unfounded.
Police departments in larger Missouri cities like Springfield and St. Louis reflected much lower numbers of unfounded rape cases than Cape Girardeau.
Over the past three years, about 7 percent of the 267 rapes reported to Springfield police were unfounded, according to the state statistics.
Of the 871 rape complaints taken by St. Louis metropolitan police department, 5 percent were cleared in the unfounded column.
Welch cautioned against comparing UCR data from one jurisdiction to another because of differences in demographics.
"Trying to compare them may not be accurate even if they are relatively the same size," Welch said.
Though the purpose of the UCR program at its inception in 1929 was to create a reliable standard of measurement for crime statistics across the nation, the system may be too general to provide a realistic portrayal of something as complex and misunderstood as unfounded rape allegations.
"You're taking one statute here in Missouri and squeezing it into one definition when there may be a whole different statute in Texas," said Welch, the highway patrol auditor.
Part of the inconsistency may stem from a lack of understanding about how certain rape reports should be categorized, Welch said.
In cases where the victim recants during the investigation, saying she made up the rape, Cape Girardeau police typically cleared those cases, considering them unfounded.
In Kanin's study, victim recantation was used as the sole reason for marking a rape allegation as false, something Archambault said she strongly advises investigators against doing. Many genuine victims of rape will at some point take back their allegations because of the social and emotional consequences of reporting the rape, Archambault said.
"Imagine the power we give a rapist when the victim recants and is not believed," Archambault said.
Murphy, the former prosecutor, said the use of the word "unfounded" serves to support common mythologies surrounding the crime of rape and that a different measuring system should be established.
"It's a harsh, powerful, incorrect word," Murphy said. "It gives scientific support to the myth that women lie about rape."
Welch said UCR standards dictate that investigators should proceed with their investigation regardless of whether the victim takes back her original story.
"They should not be deterred by what the victim says. They have to follow through with the investigation and verify the veracity of what the victim is saying," Welch said.
At the Springfield Police Department, investigators must prove the rape did not happen in order to consider it an unfounded crime -- something that "just does not happen that often," said Sherry Royal, custodian of records for the department.
"It's traumatic -- I could see someone saying it didn't happen just so they don't have to go through with it," Royal said.
The investigations
In December 2007, a waitress in her late teens was at a party with a friend. She left to go to a Cape Girardeau bar and returned to the house of a man she knew. There, they smoked cigarettes, listened to music and eventually had sex, an act the woman described as not consensual. She became angry afterward and told police she had called several friends to come get her from the man's house. Six days after reporting the rape, she told a Cape Girardeau sex crimes investigator that she had used poor judgment, was not raped and did not want the report to go any further.
The case is an example of one where Cape Girardeau police might now choose to keep the file active, but previously it had been classified as unfounded, the case cleared from the yearly totals of actual rapes.
"I'm always so cautious myself to say these things are unfounded because it doesn't cost anything to keep it open," Archambault said.
Because police traditionally measure their success in terms of their "clearance rates," or how few active cases they have at the end of the year, a strong temptation exists for some departments to clear rape cases too quickly, Archambault said.
"Historically, they've been pressured to close them because of clearance rates," she said.
Because of the serious cost to the victim when a legitimate rape case is discounted, the classification shouldn't be used as a clearing mechanism, Archambault said.
Kinnison said these cases represent a difficult decision for the department because the department wants to respect the victim but the department doesn't want to be penalized for having too many open cases when there is likely no way to resolve it without the victim's cooperation. The success of the department can be judged by the community based on the number of cases that are cleared and the number of cases that are left open, he said.
Doug Richards, director of Southeast Missouri State University Department of Public Safety, said he doesn't allow his detectives to classify cases as unfounded. If there is a suspect named in the case, it is turned over to the Cape Girardeau County prosecuting attorney's office for consideration.
"I don't want there to be any questions that we aren't taking these cases seriously," Richards said.
Of the five rape and two sexual misconduct cases reported to campus police over the past three years, two remain active investigations and five were turned over to prosecutors, who declined to file charges in all of them.
Turning every case over to prosecutors isn't necessarily the most efficient way to handle rape cases because investigators should be able to "sell" the case, Archambault said.
"If we send a case to a prosector, we should believe we have a case," Archambault said.
According to rape reports requested by the Southeast Missourian, in the fall of 2008, a 21-year-old woman reported that she had been raped at a fraternity house. She became upset when investigators questioned her about her drinking activities. At a club earlier that night, a witness saw the victim talking to, flirting with and hanging on the suspect. "I know how she is," that witness told police. The victim stopped returning investigators' phone calls, and prosecutors advised police they would not file charges based on the belief the rape allegation was made up. The case was classified as unfounded.
"For a woman truly victimized in a sexual assault, it's a very challenging thought to see this thing through to the very end," said Lt. Mark Ballser of the Liberty Police Department.
Cape Girardeau investigator Debi Oliver said she begins every case by assuming the victim is being absolutely truthful.
Upon request from the Southeast Missourian, Archambault reviewed a handful of investigative reports of closed, unfounded rape cases obtained by Missouri Sunshine Law requests.
"I thought they were doing a pretty good job by going through with the investigations," Archambault said.
However, Archambault said she did see some red flags in some of the reports by Cape Girardeau officers that indicated a pattern of judgments being passed. It's a trap she said was easy for investigators to fall into because of what she called "our own institutional bias" and lack of training and education.
"These cases just get so messy," Archambault said.
Concerned that genuine rape victims could be having their cases classified as unfounded, Archambault suggested assembling multidisciplinary teams to review some of the unfounded cases.
In one report, Archambault said, the victim kept repeating the incident had been her fault because she'd been intoxicated, a common occurrence with rape victims, but not necessarily one that fits the stereotype most people have of a rape, she said.
"I find that a big indicator that she's being truthful," Archambault said.
These types of victims are some of the most high-risk, she said.
"There is still a great skepticism among traditional investigative entities that women lie about being assaulted, and the lies are for pretty traditional reasons -- they want to get someone in trouble, or they regret sexual activity they participated in," said Tammy Gwaltney, director of Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence.
"We do see some revenge reporting, if someone has a grudge," Ballser said.
In another Cape Girardeau rape report, Archambault said the victim admitted using crack cocaine and that if a victim were lying and got to "make her own script," she wouldn't likely incriminate herself in a felony.
Kinnison said investigations are "evidence-based," citing an example where a victim's story was contradicted by a surveillance camera showing she accompanied the suspect willingly to take money from her ATM account.
When a case is unfounded, the evidence is preserved and the case can always be reopened in light of new evidence, Oliver said.
"We have that option, and we sincerely mean it," she said.
Oliver, who holds a master's degree in psychological counseling, will receive free training from Archambault next month on a merit-based scholarship. In addition to being executive director of End Violence Against Women International, Archambault is also the president and training director of Sexual Assault Training and Investigations, which provides training and expert consultation to law enforcement regarding crimes of rapes and sexual assault.
Welch said after completing his UCR audit of the 2008 rapes cases reported in Cape Girardeau, he found the investigations to be accurate, aside from the previously mentioned change in classification.
"The biggest thing agencies need to do is to just let the numbers fall where they may," he said, adding that crime sometimes fluctuates without explanation.
"This has been a good exercise for us," Kinnison said of examining the unfounded rapes.
"The thing I'm most concerned about is that we're doing it right," he said.
Former Southeast Missourian intern Brian Schraum contributed to this report.
388-3635
![[SeMissourian.com]](http://www.semissourian.com/images/nameplate.gif)



Good point, Maki! Karma, man, she'll get hers!
Where not a rape , but a sexual harassment at work the woman was taken on her word without even an interview of me.
I was asked to sign a paper saying I made an inappropiate comment to my female co-worker ( I had made the comment)I told the boss I'd sign the paper as long as he put down on paper the inappropriate touching the female had done before I made the comment.
He was upset & flabbergasted that I would want the truth in writing , yet had not even considered that I may have been innocent or that there were extenuating circumstances , upon hearing my side the whole incident was dropped .
Yeah, this is a VERY scary story. I wonder how many poor blokes were sold down the river due to some lying wench.
I think there is a much bigger story here... the true story is how pressured females are at SEMO to engage in "party" sex. And then they regret it and report rape. I would like to see Bridget do a story about that.
"party" sex is having sex with any guy at a party or many guys in order to appear that you are "down with it." It happens more often than any parent wants to believe. For example I know of one boy who had to be in a DNA line up to find out who the daddy of a baby was.... this girl had party sex at SEMO and got pregnant. She named every guy she had slept with during that short period of time. The "lucky" guy who ended up being daddy was #7 in the DNA line up.
very sick- but it seems to me that there is a huge pressure amongst college students to have the "casual sex" attitude, and they use sex as a form of entertainment... only to discover afterward how stupid their behavior was.
As usual, the Southeast Missourian is attempting to scare the public by throwing the Cape Girardeau Police Department under the bus again. The title of the article is deceiving at best. Three paragraphs into the article the author is recanting by saying Rape "is one of the most difficult crimes to investigate. The evidence often boils down to one person's word against another's, making rapes difficult to prove in court." This is the only practical statement in the article. The rest of the article is based on Uniform Crime Reports which every police department knows are not the whole story. The writer doesn't take time to understand that he is not toying with traffic offenses minor misdemeanors here. Rape is a Class A Felony in this state and not taken lightly by the police or court system with a minimum sentence of 15+ years. I gathered from the article that every time a female regrets the next morning and makes a report, the police should carry it as an open case even when she realizes the magnitude of making a false allegation. Yes, women get raped and sexual assaulted and these investigations should be pursued as far possible. But, unless there is other evidence to support a Rape charge, the police cannot pull a rabbitt out of the hat and pursue prosecution with a victim who is going to testify she lied. Most Missouri Police Departments and I know the Cape Girardeau Police Department has gone to great efforts to have a trained officer specific to sexual assault victims. Of course, that is never identified in the article. UCR reports are just that, statistics. They are going to be higher in certain classifications in certain geographical areas than others, which is what makes them "statistics." The Cape Girardeau Police are doing as they should, looking at the cases individually on its' own merits. I give credit to Chief Kinnison for not letting the author drag him into a heated debate.
I interpreted the quote differently.
"In the past, we were believing the victim if she says 'I lied,'" Kinnison said.
To me that means the victim gets tired of reliving the trauma & humiliation of a real attack, and recants her true statement.
Seems the huge percentage of rape victims who NEVER report their rape were not important enough to mention in this very lengthy piece?
Kanin's study was given WAY too much credit/weight in this article. ie...a case study of one police agency in a small metropolitan area (population 70,000). Far cry from an empirical study.
There IS something wrong when comparison data is this variable. Could be the way the data has been tracked/collected. Could be the way reported rape cases are handled. Either way, something is wrong in Cape's Police Department.
Kinnison said..."The more efficient the department, the more unfoundeds you will see," Doesn't this statement bother anyone else? Efficient at what? Sweeping rapes off the "to do list"? Making rape victims feel their case is not valid to continue the investigation?
OK men, if you were raped (by a man), would you report it? It's very much the same thing. You would not want to report it because of how you'd be seen. You certainly wouldn't make it up to get revenge on someone!
Very few women would ever falsly report rape. It is too humiliating! There is a physical examination then reporting the act over and over, then having your reputation, drinking habits, social life, private life all under scrutiny and your truthfulness being judged by mostly males. Not a very worthwile way to get revenge.
And WHY if a woman felt bad about a sexual encounter would she then go make it public by reporting it to the police as a rape? Seems much easier to lie and say it didn't happen than to lie and say it was rape! C'mon people!
I'm not saying there are NEVER false reports, but there aren't that many. Most women would never put themselves through that ordeal if it didn't happen. That is why many go unreported. On top of the attack itself, now they have to be under scrutiny of whether or not I'm telling the truth about it!
And YES, many women do recant when they were telling the truth in the first place to avoid the negative consequences of the investigation. Just like kids would recant or deny abuse to protect themselves from further or worse harm by the abuser. That's why the women should not necessarily be believed when they say they lied.
It IS a messy deal. I hope none of you have to experience it yourself or in your family to understand. Willy, Mega, what if this was your mother, wife, daughter, sister?
frazzled63701,
Sounds like "Susie Sorority" has taken the concept of "casual college sex" to a knew level. The joke used to be, "What does Susie Sorority do the first thing in the morning? Get's up and goes home."
I guess they should change that too, "What does Susie Sorority do first thing in the morning? Take a pregnancy test."
chocolatte,
It doesn't help your case to make your post into a personal attack on those who have a different view. It just makes you sound like an "angry woman."
The fact is, how many lives have been ruined due to to "fictious" stories and false accusations? Can it not be said that the poor blokes who were sold down the river by a fountain of lies where also victims? Raped of their integrity? Aka...the Duke Boys. Remember how many lives that destroyed?
I am not denying the fact that many cases go unreported or that many cases have an altered outcome due to a true victim changing stories; however, facts are facts...there are "unfounded" accusations made and created by fictious and embellished finger pointers.
It's those types of false allegations that have destroyed the gender gap, placed a speed bump into the normal development of relations between the opposite sex, and further confused the role of the male and female genders.
Chocolatte, you sound like a level headed woman. There are a lot of women out there that let their emotions get out of control and they aren't using their brain. They don't care about their pride as long as they get the revenge they want.
Exactly! Thank you for stating that so well, choco & Melange. That's exactly what I was thinking.
Don't dismiss this as nothing more than angry women using police to get even with spurned beaus.
The Cape Girardeau Police Department has had chronic problems reporting violent crime accurately. Some 30 years ago I personally know of a woman who was sexually assaulted, but the CGPD reported the crime as "breaking and entering" on the daily blotter to The Southeast Missourian and the rest of the local media. Technically cute, but factually incorrect.
This spurred an investigation by this newspaper of underreported crimes by the CGPD, to make themselves look better in the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports. People were fired for that back then, but there has always been an undercurrent in local law enforcement to make things look "better" by lying about the true scope of crime in Cape.
The Southeast Missourian is right to explore this avenue again, to see if local authorities are lying to us AGAIN, and make the city factually support the crime reports it shares with the public.
Your article does a grave disservice to the countless men and boys falsely accused of sexual assault every year in this country. It is written looking through the lens of the sexual assault advocates' cottage industry, which never met a rape claim it considered false. The fact of the matter is that false rape claims are Western Civilization's taboo epidemic.
I write for one of the few websites that give voice to the falsely accused, The False Rape Society. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/
Here are the facts: In recent years laudable efforts have been made to properly sanction nonconsensual sexual misconduct and to make reporting rape easier than ever. But in waging the war on rape, we have allowed an entire class of victim -- those wrongly accused of this vile crime -- to be treated as nothing more than collateral damage despite the grievous harm many suffer.
What your article doesn't reveal is this: Every serious and unbiased study ever conducted on false rape claims shows that they are a significant problem -- every single one -- and objectively verifiable data indicates that likely close to half of all rape claims, and possibly more, are false.
Your article denigrates Professor Kanin's study which found 41% of all reported rapes in a Midwestern town over nine years were not only false but recanted (which means the number of false reports might have been even higher). The "force" used by police was a routine polygraph -- which is not verboten in the radical feminist world (but only for rape accusers -- men accused of rape, and convicted sex offenders, still need to take them if they want to stay out of jail). No mention was made of the follow-up study that did not include polygraphs and that found that 50% of false rape claims were false. Nor is there mention of the McDowell Air Force study that found 45% of all rape claims were false.
Yet sexual assault counselors often disingenuously refer to false rape accusations as a "myth." Victims of false rape claims cut across every socio-economic class but are almost exclusively male, and the crime of making a false rape report has become unnecessarily gender-politicized and so embroiled in the radical feminist sexual assault milieu that it has been improperly removed from the public discourse about rape.
Everyone agrees that people of both genders lie about everything under the sun for all manner of reasons, good, bad and indifferent -- except, according to some feminists, when it comes to rape. In that singular instance, mirabile dictu, one gender is incapable of telling a lie while the other is incapable of telling anything but lies. The very discussion of rape becomes a sort of truth serum for women, a magic elixir that forces anyone not possessing a Y-chromosome to utter incontrovertible fact. Is this in any sense plausible to a fair-minded person? The question scarcely survives its statement.
By any measure, denigrating the experience of the wrongly accused by dismissing their victimization as a "myth" -- unworthy of our discussion, much less our protection -- is not merely dishonest but morally grotesque.
You would do well to check out my website which is updated daily about this taboo epidemic.
I sincerely apologize if I came across as attacking someone with a different viewpoint. I never meant to imply that false accusations NEVER happen, I simply meant that it seems many people think MOST reports are made up.
It seems that many of the unfounded cases are those in which the lady was socializing to some extent with the attacker before things went bad. As a teacher, I stress to my female students their responsibility to protect themselves at all times - including drinking responsibly, socializing responsibly, and not putting themselves in situations in which they are not in control. And to my male students I stress the same thing. No always means no, drink responsibly, socialize responsibly, and don't do anything that could be misconstrued later - and if that means abstinence, all the better!
Not to argue anyone's personal opinion, but ... Wouldn't it be difficult or even impossible for anyone to determine or even estimate how many rapes go unreported, if they were in fact unreported? Or to know how many who recanted were actually raped--or not? Or even to know how many rapes are reported that were actually consensual sex?
A good post, chocolatte: What most young women don't seem to always realize is that in dressing and behaving provocatively, they are sending a message to the men that actually sort of says they are 'ready and willing.' What many young men don't seem to realize is that 'no' really does mean no, regardless of their interpretation of the woman's 'message.'
Guru, you should be ashamed & I find your comment uncharacteristic of your usual contributions.
The dress of a woman never says "I'm ready & willing" to be raped. This is the exact cause of the problem of women dropping their case, because they are being "blamed" for being raped.
Men are responsible for the rape, regardless of the clothes a woman is wearing or the alcohol she may or may not have consumed. Now, women are responsible for keeping themselves out of potentially dangerous situations in which rape could occur, but it's never her "fault".
I suppose the 80 year old grandma raped here in town a couple of months ago was dressed in a provative mu-mu or flannel night gown.
Rape is not a crime about sex, it's about power.
Just_me, I think you might have misunderstood. I think guru was trying to say is that some guys might perceive it that way...not that that is how it actually is. In "date" or aquaintance rape situations, I think it might often be a case of mixed signals. BOTH parties are responsible for protecting themselves - ladies from putting themselves in unsafe situations, guys from false accusations.
I don't think anyone would fault the 80 year old lady for what happened. I think statistically that is not the "typical" rape. Most women are raped by men they know.
Yes! Absolutely "no" means no! But at the same time, a lapse in a lady's judgement (possibly due to alcohol) that puts her in a guy's apartment or bed can give way to a guy's lapse in judgement of her signals when she says, "Stop". That's what makes it all so messy and difficult to get to the bottom of.
I think when it is a violent rape by a stranger, the evidence is more obvious, and those are less likely to be unfounded, possibly due to society seeing it as clearly wrong and NOT the victim's fault. In acquaintance rape, it's not so cut and dried. There is a lot more speculation on everyone's part.
Good point, just_me. It is about power. But I think in the cases when alcohol and drugs are involved, it is sometimes just bad judgement.
I think this article is at the very least a good way to talk to our children - sons and daughters alike - about being responsible and making wise choices.
Thanks, chocolatte ... That's exactly what I meant. Your thoughts and comments and concern are very admirable and intelligent.
And sorry, Just_Me, for having stated things so badly. I would NEVER excuse rape, no matter what the circumstances, and never blame the women ... Just trying to say that many young women may not realize that some men really do seem to view provocativeness as an invitation of sorts to consensual sex--especially when alcohol is involved.
I do apologize. It seems that 2009 is going to be my Year of Being Misunderstood ... Just another year closer to senility, maybe?