![[SeMissourian.com]](http://www.semissourian.com/images/nameplate.png)
RSS
Print
Email link
Respond to editor
Read comments (6)
Money to support such things as mentoring and curriculum improvement programs for teachers was removed from the Missouri House of Representatives version of the budget. School officials said they are concerned about service to smaller, rural schools that depend heavily on the state programs.
"We have a lot of poverty in our region. We feel like it would be really detrimental to our schools," said Cheri Fuemmeler, director of the Southeast Regional Professional Development Center.
The development programs are already operating at a reduced level. Past budgets included $20 million for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to support the services. Last year's budget included $15 million.
The House version of the budget does not include any money and would cut the majority of funding to regional development centers and the programs they offer. The $22.9 billion spending plan is up for a vote this week. If the money is not restored during floor action, advocates will turn to the Senate for help.
"The development centers would suffer," said Sen. Rob Mayer, R-Dexter, chairman of the Senate Education Committee and vice chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. "I'm not certain they could stay in existence."
There are nine regional professional development centers throughout the state, including one at Southeast Missouri State University that works with 89 school districts in the region.
Fuemmeler said the center has some federally funded programs but that its fate is in question. She said the state funding is critical for the districts in the region because the center's programming is extensive.
"There's not any district that we have not had a presence in, in some capacity," she said.
Dr. Ron Anderson, superintendent of the Jackson School District, said professional development is necessary, with or without state funding.
"Staff development is critical," Anderson said. "In fact, it's required by law."
Anderson said it would be possible to replace the state programming in his district, but on a smaller scale.
"I'm sure it would be difficult to match what they're doing," he said. Smaller districts, he said, would lack the manpower to replace the services.
State education officials are working to restore the money. Interim commissioner of education Bert Schulte said he is still hopeful and open to discussion.
"I have some optimism," Schulte said. "We want to remain optimistic that there will be some restoration of the funds."
Mayer said restoring the funds at a lower level, if at all, will be a challenge given the economic climate.
"I think the possibility exists that we could get some money back into this fund," Mayer said. "However, at this point, I think it's going to be difficult."
The money appropriated for teacher development programs came under criticism in recent budgeting cycles. Mayer said some legislators wanted more oversight. The state of the economy will influence the appropriation this year, he said.
"We have to look for areas where we can make cuts that won't hurt as bad as other areas," he said.
388-3627
Does this affect you?
Have a comment?
Log on to semissourian.com
Pertinent address:
920 Broadway Cape Girardeau, MO
Comments
Does removing state funds accomplish keeping teachers in their classrooms to teach? Professional development takes teachers out of the classroom. Teachers need to continue their education/skills at times other than the school day.
Marilyn_Monroe
When you do job training, do you do it on company(contract) time or your personal time like your normal unpaid days off?
Professional Development helps our teachers keep up on their education, so that our students can have the best and latest information. Don't you want your kids to have the best education possible? Teachers deserve to get training during their work day, just like any other occupation.
Professional Development funds pay for:
Blindness Skills
Teacher Training
Nationally Recognized leaders to present to our Southeast Educators - one school could not afford to pay for this, but many schools can attend if professional development funding is used
MAP Test which is mandated for our students.
I guess if you want to have teachers that never get any updates on anything then you should not support professional development. That isn't me.
Professional Development helps our teachers keep up on their education, so that our students can have the best and latest information. Don't you want your kids to have the best education possible? Teachers deserve to get training during their work day, just like any other occupation.
Professional Development funds pay for:
Blindness Skills
Teacher Training
Nationally Recognized leaders to present to our Southeast Educators - one school could not afford to pay for this, but many schools can attend if professional development funding is used
MAP Test which is mandated for our students.
I guess if you want to have teachers that never get any updates on anything then you should not support professional development. That isn't me.
I have taught in Missouri and Georgia for nearly 30 years. In this time I have been sent to numerous training sessions for the "latest and greatest" new ideas in education, at least two new ideas per year.I have attended conferences to represent my school and to teach others ideas from my district.If all of these experiences had been "on my own time" I would not have any time of my own or time for my family or time to plan lessons at home,or time to grade papers at home, or time to buy supplies for class with my own money, or time to come in early and stay late to set up hands-on activities for my classes.There needs to be a balance. If teachers are going to be able to meet with their peers and share ideas and concerns about students, some in school time needs to be set aside.The concept is similar to parents getting a babysitter and going out now and then.If we have done a good job and laid the ground work the kids will be fine, they will even benefit from their teachers new experiences.
I have taught in Missouri and Georgia for nearly 30 years. In this time I have been sent to numerous training sessions for the "latest and greatest" new ideas in education, at least two new ideas per year.I have attended conferences to represent my school and to teach others ideas from my district.If all of these experiences had been "on my own time" I would not have any time of my own or time for my family or time to plan lessons at home,or time to grade papers at home, or time to buy supplies for class with my own money, or time to come in early and stay late to set up hands-on activities for my classes.There needs to be a balance. If teachers are going to be able to meet with their peers and share ideas and concerns about students, some in school time needs to be set aside.The concept is similar to parents getting a babysitter and going out now and then.If we have done a good job and laid the ground work the kids will be fine, they will even benefit from their teachers new experiences.