- Cape student sues, accuses school officials of slamming her to ground multiple times (04/28/16)46
- Bob Evans restaurant in Cape Girardeau among chain's 21 closings (04/26/16)9
- Missouri House votes to allow concealed weapons without permits (04/28/16)7
- Police report filed, but no charges in incident at Cape Central (04/29/16)38
- Two hurt in motorcycle wreck on Interstate 55 (04/25/16)1
- Senator introduces bill for I-57 that would connect Sikeston with Little Rock (04/28/16)4
- Law firm requests information about Cape's traffic cameras (04/25/16)2
- Local lawmakers split over failed medical marijuana bill; voters may have a say (04/26/16)19
- Local company makes eco-friendly kitty litter that cuts cat-box smell (04/25/16)
- Man accused of pointing BB gun at Chaffee resident (04/26/16)2
Bill would require prescriptions for Sudafed to deter meth cooks
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- A doctor's visit and a prescription would be needed for many cold medicines under a Missouri bill targeting methamphetamine production.
Supporters say requiring a prescription for medicine containing the decongestant pseudephedrine would stymie meth producers who go to multiple pharmacies, buying the maximum amount of the drug allowed by law. They argue that visiting multiple doctors and securing multiple prescriptions would scare away many of the producers.
Under current Missouri law, people can buy up to 9 grams of pseudoephedrine every 30 days. That works out to about two 15-dose boxes of 24-hour Claritin D or six 24-dose boxes of Sudafed.
Buyers must go to a pharmacy and sign a paper log with certain identifying information and the amount of the drug purchased. Law enforcement officials say that system is often abused.
"How many more people are going to die of a methamphetamine overdose or how many more houses are going to catch fire because of these labs?" said Democratic Rep. Jeff Roorda, a former police officer from Barnhart.
Opponents of the bill, including two of the state's medical groups, say requiring a prescription would increase waiting times and costs for patients who need only basic medical care.
A committee was scheduled to hear testimony on a Senate version of the bill Monday night.
In 2006, Oregon placed pseudoephedrine on the list of drugs that require a prescription. Officials there say the move nearly eliminated local meth labs because it addressed "group smurfing." That practice involves several people buying up the maximum amount of pseudoephedrine products in concert and giving the pills to meth producers.
Missouri has long led the nation in meth lab busts. It had 1,285 busts in 2007, according to the Missouri State Highway Patrol. That was nearly a quarter of the nationwide meth lab incidents.
Last year, Missouri lawmakers authorized a statewide electronic monitoring system for pseudephedrine-based drugs. Lawmakers said they were trying to create a real-time monitoring system so "smurfers" could not shop around at different pharmacies to load up on meth-making ingredients.
Ron Fitzwater, executive director of the Missouri Pharmacy Association, said that system has not been given a chance to work. Lawmakers authorized the system but did not release funds for its creation.
"We think that is still the best option," Fitzwater said. "It continues to keep legitimate products available for legitimate patients."
Roorda argued requiring a prescription for the drugs is much more effective than creating an electronic log.
That way, he said, "the state's not dumping money into a database that we don't know will work."
The state's main doctor's group says the prescription bill could clog doctor's offices and drive up fees, and waiting times, for basic cold medicine.
"It's just a little bit more burdensome for doctors and a little more costly for patients," said Jeff Howell, a lobbyist for the Missouri State Medical Association. "It's just too much of a hassle to receive treatment for that type of cold."
Meth bill is SB160 and HB623
On the Net: