- Feds ask judge to impose $6.5 million punishment for Cape surgeon (12/7/17)9
- Harbor Freight Tools plans to move ahead with Cape Girardeau store (12/5/17)2
- Light and music show: Jackson family goes high-tech with Christmas display (12/11/17)
- Former Wimpy's Drive-In owner Freeman Lewis dies (12/9/17)2
- Makeover at the movies: Transformation complete inside Cape theater (12/8/17)4
- Sugarfire Cape barbecue restaurant to open June 2018 (12/7/17)
- Jury convicts Scott City man who confessed to murder; girlfriend's testimony corroborates confession (12/9/17)
- Pedestrian struck on Broadway (12/11/17)4
- Business Notebook: Yule Log Cabin gets home feel honestly (12/4/17)
- Fruitland Army veteran spends weeks helping in ravaged Puerto Rico (12/5/17)2
Censorship must be challenged
To the editor:
"Sister Mary Ignatius" was first performed on Dec. 14, 1979. Since that performance it has been read and performed in hundreds (if not thousands) of venues from high schools to public theaters and was made into a major motion picture staring Diane Keaton in 2001. This play is a satire.
We do not all agree on all issues, but we all do have the constitutional right to express (or sample) diverse views. When those who have a particular viewpoint or who have administrative or financial power attempt to restrict or restrain the choice of others, we should all be greatly concerned.
Any patron has the right to express any opinion of a play or event using any accepted medium (e.g. letter in a newspaper, direct communication with someone). Those rights are not in question, and, in the case of the satirical play "Sister Mary Ignatius," the expressions of condemnation by individuals were appropriate and may very well not have had the intention of censorship.
The issue of importance is the subsequent response by the administration of Southeast Missouri State University. As discussed in the Faculty Senate and in other public meetings by various administrators, the explicit pressures and apparent intimidation applied by the administration to control the nature of productions organized by the Department of Theatre and Dance constitute censorship. This cannot pass unchallenged.
RICHARD A. SEBBY, Professor, Department of Psychology, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau