Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 49°F  
River stage: 34 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (1) Share link

Going too far

Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Two Cape Girardeau County men who are registered sex offenders face charges under a new Missouri law that requires them to refrain from Halloween activities involving children. The law, which already has withstood a challenge in federal court, is a bad law that sanctions selective harassment of convicted sexual offenders while providing no more protection than an existing law that requires sex offenders to be registered so the public can know of their crimes and their whereabouts.

The law requiring sex offenders to register with the sheriff's department has provided information useful to the public, especially when offenders move from county to county. Law-abiding residents have a right to know who the sex offenders are and where they live so they can take appropriate precautions.

The so-called Halloween law, however, goes far beyond providing information to the public. It requires sex offenders to stay indoors, turn off their porch lights and post a sign saying "No candy or treats at this residence." (How anyone can read the sign without a light is unclear.)

This Halloween, the first since the law went into effect in August, sheriff's deputies checked on 13 of the more than 85 addresses of registered sexual offenders in Cape Girardeau County. Three summonses for violations were issued, including one to a man who wasn't at home. One of the charges later was dismissed.

One of the summonses was issued to a man who planned to stay in the upstairs bedroom of his parents' home. Thus the new law effectively curbed the activities of law-abiding citizens as well.

This new law goes too far. It smacks of the scarlet A (for adulterer) that Hester Prynne was forced to wear in "The Scarlet Letter." It has overtones of the yellow Star of David Jews were forced to wear under Nazi orders. Let the sex-offender registry do its job. This additional legal broadside is unnecessary.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

when you have a child that has been assaulted then you may see the laws a little different. Once someone committs the crime then they should loose their rights. If we had tougher sentencing laws in the first place and less plea deals it wouldn't be an issue.

-- Posted by semoangel70 on Tue, Nov 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: