Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 64°F  
River stage: 33.86 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (2) Share link

Men accused in mortgage fraud scheme seek low bond

Friday, November 14, 2008

The two men accused of pocketing almost $500,000 from a mortgage fraud scheme pleaded poverty Thursday in seeking a low bond while they await trial.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Lewis Blanton set the bond at $20,000 each for Robert Wrolstad, 59, and Russell T. McBride, 46, after the attorneys for each man said they were unemployed and could not afford the higher $50,000 bond sought by assistant federal prosecutor Paul Hahn.

Wrolstad, of Overland, Mo., and McBride, of St. Charles, Mo., are charged with finding buyers for low-value homes in Sikeston, Mo., then submitting bogus appraisals to lending companies to fool the lenders in to providing mortgages that were as much as nine times the actual selling price.

Federal prosecutors allege that between July 2005 and November 2006, when mortgage companies nationally were lending with low standards, McBride and Wrolstad, acting through a company called Century Mortgage and Finance Inc., used knowledge of the loose lending practices to enrich themselves. Century Mortgage operated offices in Cape Girardeau, Sikeston and St. Louis.

The case involves 12 homes and the indictment accuses McBride and Wrolstad of pocketing proceeds from almost $500,000 in inflated mortgages.

McBride faces 31 felony counts, while Wrolstad is charged with 28 felony counts in the indictment.

McBride is a former Cape Girardeau resident. He was politically prominent in the late 1980s and early 1990s, holding such positions as Democratic Party county chairman and 8th Congressional District chairman.

The two men appeared separately before Blanton.

In arguing for the lower bond, Wrolstad's attorney, Patrick McMenamin, argued Wrolstad had sought to cooperate with investigators over the past year, was not a flight risk and could not afford to post a $50,000 bond. The higher bond, he said, "would be a hardship for his family."

The offers of cooperation show that Wrolstad did not intend to flee, McMenamin said. "He has known this was coming and is certainly not a flight risk."

Hahn said the size of the losses incurred by the lenders in the case and the lengthy sentence that could be imposed justified the higher bond.

Blanton allowed Wrolstad to pay $2,000 as security on the full $20,000 bond. When McBride was in court about an hour later, Blanton asked Hahn if there was any reason McBride should be treated differently from Wrolstad.

Hahn again cited the size of the alleged fraud, the severity of the potential punishment and added that McBride, unlike Wrolstad, has a criminal history.

McBride entered an Alford plea in 1997 on charges of conspiracy to commit arson in an attempt to obtain insurance money. He was given a suspended sentence.

Blanton allowed McBride to also post 10 percent, or $2,000, of the $20,000 bond amount.

Both court hearings were over quickly. Neither man entered a plea. Both men were ordered to return to court on Tuesday for arraignment.

Wrolstad and McBride were indicted in April, but the charges were kept under seal until Monday. After Wrolstad's hearing, Hahn said the indictment was kept under wraps for seven months because of the ongoing nature of the investigation.

rkeller@semissourian.com

388-3642


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

A bond this low has to be disappointing for the victims.

-- Posted by grandma72 on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 1:30 PM

The ammount of a bond is susposed to be determanined by the severness of the crime commited not buy the ammount of money the criminal has. If thats the case a homeless person who comits a crime and has no job or family should get a ten cent bond no matter how severe the crime,

-- Posted by newman90 on Fri, Nov 14, 2008, at 4:25 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: