- Bob Evans restaurant in Cape Girardeau among chain's 21 closings (04/26/16)9
- Cape student sues, accuses school officials of slamming her to ground multiple times (04/28/16)40
- Two hurt in motorcycle wreck on Interstate 55 (04/25/16)1
- Ray's of Kelso, Plaza by Ray's to change ownership; Fonn to buy enterprise (04/20/16)3
- Missouri House votes to allow concealed weapons without permits (04/28/16)6
- Cape council approves nearly $1M in park, sculpture projects with little public discussion (04/22/16)37
- Law firm requests information about Cape's traffic cameras (04/25/16)2
- Tanker truck catches fire near Oak Ridge (04/24/16)7
- Local lawmakers split over failed medical marijuana bill; voters may have a say (04/26/16)19
- Local company makes eco-friendly kitty litter that cuts cat-box smell (04/25/16)
Steelman stays silent after Mo. Republican governor's primary
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- As a gubernatorial candidate, Sarah Steelman seldom skipped a chance to speak out against Republican rival Kenny Hulshof. After losing the primary, Steelman's silence speaks even louder.
In a break from modern political tradition, Steelman so far has not endorsed Hulshof in his November general election against Democrat Jay Nixon. In fact, since election night, Steelman has said nothing at all about Hulshof.
Enhancing the silence is that Steelman was expected -- at least by Hulshof -- to have made some positive public statement about his candidacy by now.
On the night of the Aug. 5 primary, Steelman called Hulshof to congratulate him and told The Associated Press: "I wished him the best of luck, and the two of us agreed to sit down and talk sometime soon."
True to her word, Steelman met with Hulshof at a Jefferson City coffee shop Aug. 18. The meeting occurred on a Monday morning. In early afternoon, Hulshof spokesman Scott Baker said: "A statement is pending!"
But no statement came from Steelman nor Hulshof that afternoon, nor evening, nor the next morning. Asked around noon Tuesday whether some sort of supportive statement still was coming, Baker replied: "I intend to have something for you this afternoon."
But nothing came then, or since. Hulshof called Steelman Tuesday night for some further discussion. Baker described the conversation as "cordial" and "very positive."
Steelman said she was "thinking about things" but declined to comment further about whether she would publicly back Hulshof.
There are plenty of reasons she might be reluctant to do so.
Steelman, the state treasurer, repeatedly criticized Hulshof -- a 12-year congressman -- as a wasteful, big-spending Washington politician during their Republican primary. She called for the repeal of Missouri's ethanol mandate, which Hulshof supports. And she belittled -- and struggled against -- the spate of endorsements Hulshof received from most of Missouri's top Republican elected officials and influential business groups.
For Steelman to suggest her supporters should now follow Hulshof -- if the statement is not carefully crafted -- could come off as insincere or imply that party politics are more important than what she had presented as a principled stand during the campaign.
But politicians routinely pull an about-face.
A little over a week after losing to John McCain in Missouri and various other Super Tuesday primary states, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney stood beside McCain and publicly endorsed him.
When Barack Obama finally secured enough delegates for Democratic presidential nomination, Hillary Clinton privately met with Obama and, just four days after her loss, publicly declared: "I endorse him and throw my full support behind him."
At the time, both Clinton and Romney still had the potential of being picked by their rivals as vice presidential running mates.
Steelman has no similar hope, because lieutenant governor's candidates run simultaneously and separately from gubernatorial candidates in Missouri. Her loss also makes her a lame-duck in the treasurer's office, where she has just a few more months in her term.
One reason the primary loser typically endorses the winner is "because the losing candidate does not want to undermine their position in the party," said Richard Fulton, a political scientist at Northwest Missouri State University. "Most of them feel a loyalty to the party, and they don't want to look like a poor loser."
But Steelman never had the support of Missouri's GOP establishment; she ran a "Power to the People" campaign. And she loaned her campaign $770,000 to keep pace with Hulshof's fundraising.
"I think she really feels betrayed by the party, so she didn't feel that kind of obligation" to the party to make a unity statement, Fulton said.
Without strong encouragement from Steelman to support Hulshof, some of her grass-roots volunteers may be less inclined to put in the same effort for Hulshof.
Steelman has said nothing negative about Hulshof since the primary. But her silence still carries unfavorable implications. Democrats, for example, have been playing it up.
"By not coming out and endorsing Kenny Hulshof, she's sending a message to her supporters that it's OK to vote against the Washington establishment," said Nixon spokesman Oren Shur, adopting Steelman's primary characterization of Hulshof.
Steelman never pledged an endorsement, only a meeting. But without the subsequent endorsement, it might have been better for Hulshof if that meeting never occurred, Fulton said.
"It's sort of leaving the bridegroom at the alter -- a runaway bride -- it leaves a strange kind of aura," Fulton said. "When she meets with you and then comes away and says nothing, that leaves a very strong subliminal message -- I don't like this guy."