[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 88°F  
Heat Advisory
Friday, Aug. 22, 2014

Springfield may require owners to pay for a litter permit if their pets give birth

Monday, August 25, 2008

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. -- The city council is considering fines and permits for people who try to sell or give away unwanted puppies and kittens born to their animals.

The proposals would require anyone who wants to give away or sell litters to pay the city $100 for a "litter permit."

The Springfield City Council will consider the permit, and a related "breeder permit" in an effort to encourage owners to have their dogs and cats spayed or neutered in order to reduce the number of unwanted animals in the city.

The two ordinances are similar to those already used in St. Joseph, which has had the permits since 1995.

In St. Joseph, the litter permit costs $100. A $20 breeder permit allows a pet owner to breed a dog or cat once a year. Pet owners who ignore the rules face fines up to $500.

Brandi Crawshaw of Springfield, whose dog Comet delivered nine puppies after briefly running away from home, said the permits aren't a bad idea but the cost should be reduced.

"I think $100 is too high," she said. "Maybe they could charge a $50 fee and you'd get it all back if you do get your pet spayed."

'Carrot-and-stick approach'

The St. Joseph ordinance returns half of the $100 litter permit fee if the animal is spayed within 30 days.

Springfield councilman Dan Chiles said the St. Joseph ordinances are a "strong carrot-and-stick approach" to encouraging responsible pet ownership but the city would still have to gauge community support.

"It appears St. Joe has worked through this and has garnered a lot of community support," Chiles said. "It's not like we're going to Canada to find some pet laws. These are Missouri folks who've found a way to deal with it."

Councilwoman Cindy Rushefsky favors the proposed ordinances. She said people who let their animals breed cost taxpayers money to support the animal control department. Pet owners who know they would have to pay a fee if a pet gets pregnant may be more responsible, she said.

"I'm hoping that's what will happen," Rushefsky said. "Apparently, that's what's happening in St. Joe."

Rick Smith, director of the St. Joseph Animal Control Department, said he doesn't track the number of dog and cat litters in the city-county pound. But he said those numbers appear to have declined since the two ordinances took affect in 1995, he said.

"It is my observation that it has worked," Smith said. "We do know that at least 500 animals have been spayed because of the litter ordinance. It's an incentive for people to do the right thing and get their pets spayed or neutered."

Checking pet ads

Smith said his animal control officers enforce the litter ordinance by watching pet ads in various area newspapers. The ordinance requires people to list their permit number in the ads. If they don't, they may get a visit from one of his officers.

"If they don't have a litter permit, they're given 10 days to get one," Smith said. "If they don't, they get a citation to appear in court."

Springfield City Councilman Doug Burlison said he's concerned that the two ordinances are too intrusive.

"Anything that paints with too wide a brush, that's inappropriate," he said. "Realistically, how enforceable would that really be? If we keep a law like that on the books just to catch somebody who rises up on the radar, I've got a problem with that."

And Kevin Gipson, director of the Springfield-Greene County Health Department, questioned whether his animal control staff would have time to enforce the ordinances.

"When our people come to work, there's 40 or 50 calls waiting for them to do," Gipson said.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

While this concept is a wonderful idea, I would think that pet owners would be reluctant to run ads in the paper in hopes of finding good homes for their litters. What will happen then? Are these animals going to be dumped or inhumanely destroyed because their owners don't want to risk getting fined?

-- Posted by tammy1123 on Mon, Aug 25, 2008, at 11:21 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com or semoball.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.


Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.