Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Partly Cloudy ~ 55°F  
River stage: 34.01 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (11) Share link

Law may put end to era of Delta Queen

Sunday, July 13, 2008

(Photo)
FRED LYNCH ~ flynch@semissourian.com Passengers aboard the Delta Queen enjoyed a view of the Mississippi River and the Cape Girardeau riverfront while the paddlewheeler was docked here Nov. 2, 2006.
[Click to enlarge]
If the Mississippi River had been at normal stages Saturday, the Cape Girardeau riverfront would have resounded with calliope music and downtown shops would have welcomed visitors from the steamboat Delta Queen.

The Delta Queen is scheduled to stop in Cape Girardeau two more times this year, but they could be the last times the anachronistic vessel graces the city. Unless Congress grants the boat another exemption to a 42-year-old law, it will have to find a permanent home and stop cruising the Mississippi and its tributaries.

The Delta Queen's next Cape Girardeau stop is set for Aug. 14. It has another scheduled stop here Oct. 28, just three days before the current exemption expires. The boat's current owner, the Majestic America Line, has organized a "Save the Delta Queen" campaign that includes events at cities along the routes.

"We are paying tribute to all the communities the Delta Queen visits during the 2008 season," said Vanessa Bloy, director of public relations for the company.

"We want to make sure we thank the communities, and hope we can rally support for the exemption."

That law, banning overnight excursion boats made of wood, was designed to protect oceangoing passengers, supporters of the boat argue. But attempts to pass an extension have foundered on opposition that cites Coast Guard concerns about safety.

U.S. Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Cape Girardeau, has joined with lawmakers from districts along the rivers to support the extension. "The Delta Queen is a historic vessel that ought to be allowed to operate on the river as it always has," Emerson said. "There is no question the Delta Queen complies with any reasonable expectation for safety. More importantly, however, folks in Southern Missouri and up and down the Mississippi River look forward to the Delta Queen's stops."

The Delta Queen isn't the only excursion boat that stops in Cape Girardeau. The Mississippi Queen and the American Queen, operated like the Delta Queen by the Majestic America Line, also offer travelers the experience of cruising on a vessel that recalls the heyday of steamboating. And RiverBarge Excursion Lines Inc. operates the River Explorer, which also makes scheduled stops in Cape Girardeau for passengers to shop and dine downtown.

Those other vessels, however, are modern construction. Only the Delta Queen offers a boat built during a time when steam was the preferred power source for river traffic.

High water on the Mississippi this year has deprived downtown business owners of the boost disembarked passengers bring. A cruise on any of the boats that regularly stop at Cape Girardeau costs between $2,000 and $6,000, which means they bring affluent tourists with disposable income.

The riverboat stops provide an opportunity not only for immediate sales but also a chance to market the city, said Chuck Martin, director of the Convention and Visitors Bureau.

Missing those visits means lost income now and the loss of future potential income, Martin said. "More than once we have had people in our center [who] said they have had such a pleasant time that they are going to come back," he said. "This is one segment of what we rely on to make the community move forward as a tourism destination."

Owners of antique shops and art galleries downtown said they have missed the boats this year. Deb Maevers, who operates Pastimes Antiques, said she makes sure to open early and make passengers feel welcome with lemonade and iced tea and signs targeting them.

Passengers have made purchases both large and small, she said, adding that she has shipped items all over the country. Maevers has 63 vendors in her store and notes that most of the other antique shops downtown operate with numerous vendors as well, so the potential effect is much larger than just an individual business owner.

"We definitely will miss them saleswise," she said. "We always miss them."

At S. Gregg Gallery on Main Street, owner Steve Gregg said he's had boat passengers walk in and purchase artwork to be shipped home. "I've had instances where I sold $2,000 pieces and shipped them out," he said.

And while Gregg notes he doesn't always make a big sale when a boat is docked, "you always know you have lost the potential if they don't stop."

The prospects for passing an exemption don't appear to be good. A bill containing only the exemption is bottled up in committee. And attempts to add the exemption as a floor amendment to the Coast Guard reauthorization bill failed, as did an effort to send it back to the House Transportation Committee, said Jeff Connor, spokesman for Emerson.

Some critics have argued that the committee chairmen, Rep. James Oberstar of Minnesota and Sen. Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, are punishing Majestic America for making its three boats non-union when it purchased them in 2006.

That is false, representatives of the committees said.

Mary Kerr, a spokeswoman for the House committee, said the exemption was not renewed because "the Coast Guard views that vessel as a fire hazard."

And a spokeswoman for the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, who asked not to be identified, said the exemption was left out of the Senate bill in part because no member of the committee asked for it to be included.

Supporters of the boat said the safety concerns don't take into account that the Delta Queen is always within a mile of land, is equipped with numerous inflatable lifeboats and can put passengers ashore almost anywhere along its route.

"I am very frustrated that Congress has been to this point unable to resolve the legislative impasse that has resulted in a disappointment for everyone who is excited to see the Delta Queen traveling the river at this time each year," Emerson said.

rkeller@semissourian.com

335-6611, extension 126

Does this affect you?

Have a comment?

Log on to semissourian.com/today


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

More government B.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-- Posted by Glock_23 on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 10:37 AM

I agree completely with both of you. Maybe if they would ******* their duffs and find out more about what there trying to quash, they wouldn't be as quick to do so!! One thing that we have going for us though is Jo Ann Emerson! SHE'LL make sure they at least know the truth!

-- Posted by Sully626 on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 2:12 PM

"There is no question the Delta Queen complies with any reasonable expectation for safety. More importantly, however,---"

Do you really think Emerson knows anything at all about the safety of this boat? I find it very doubtful. What does she mean "More importantly, however---"? There is no "More importantly, however--" when you're talking about peoples lives.

In 1869 the Stonewall caught fire on the Mississippi and 209 people drowned because the ship ran aground trying to get to shore. This was just up the river at Neelys Landing.

With the locks and dams and levees, many parts of the Mississippi is no longer a lazy river. It's fast, it's mean, and it's unforgiving.

I might believe something Emerson would say about "Metamucil" or "Milk of Magnesia" but, I would venture to say she knows nothing about the safety of the Delta Queen.

-- Posted by malan on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 7:05 PM

Who Cares?

They just bus the people from the boats out to the mall and restaurants on the west side of town anyway.

Downtown is dead.

-- Posted by thegreatmosely on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 7:37 PM

In order to Save the Delta Queen from being docked permanently you need to visit the site http://www.save-the-delta-queen.org/.

My wife and I took a 7 day cruise on the beautiful, historic, friendly and safe Delta Queen in 2007. While she is 81 years old she is totally updated and safe. Passengers are welcome in the engine room. This beautiful riverboat is full of fire retardent materials, life boats and safety equipment. Passengers are given safety training before we ever leave port.

The cruise was a beautiful cruise. Food was outstanding. The crew was always friendly and helpful. Stops in various river towns were friend. We were ALWAYS in site of land.

Passenger compartments open mostly to the outside and there are many exits. The cruise is a beautiful cruise. This boat is Americana and must be preserved.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SAFETY. IT IS ABOUT POLITICS--PURE AND SIMPLE. THE FACT THAT REP. OBERSTAR WILL NOT LET THE ISSUE BE VOTED ON IS TESTAMENT TO THAT. LET IT COME TO THE FLOOR AND LET IT GET A HEARING BEFORE THE HOUSE.IT IS WIDELY REPORTED TO BE ABOUT REMOVAL OF UNIONS. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT BE. BUT IT IS VERY SUSPICIOUS. AGAIN, IT IS CLEARLY NOT ABOUT SAFETY.

NOT ONLY SHOULD PEOPLE ON THE RIVER DEMAND A HEARING FROM OUR DO NOTHING CONGRESS--BUT CITIZENS WHO TAKE PRIDE IN OUR COUNTRY AND ONE OF IT'S MOST CHERISHED SYMBOLS NEED TO WRITE THEIR REPRESENTATIVES AND DEMAND THIS BE BROUGHT TO A VOTE.

GOD AND US CITIZENS WHO CARE, SAVE THE DELTA QUEEN.

STEVEPOLL

-- Posted by Stevepoll on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 9:05 PM

Stevepoll,

Did the ultrasound of the keel show any soft spots or rot? Are all the joints still nice and tight? In reality, I'd bet you saw the safety items they wanted you to see and you are just speculating on the rest.

This type of boat was found to be unsafe for overnight river travel over forty years ago. Yet, because of a few people with deep pockets, this one has been allowed to continue. It's not just about fire, this type of boat would not fair well tangling with a barge or bridge either. Park the thing somewhere and make a day tripper out of it. I, personally, don't know one single person who thinks this is one of our country's most cherished symbols (and I know a lot of people).

As a Nation, one of our biggest problems is that we make laws and then don't enforce them. Either do away with the law or abide by it.

-- Posted by malan on Sun, Jul 13, 2008, at 10:18 PM

Malan,

Your comments are your right--however they miss the point.And they are not based on any relevant facts.

I know a lot of people--apparently more than you. Many--who believe the DQ is a national treasure and landmark, including the US Department of the Interior--who has placed the DQ on the National Register of historic landmarks. Further the law that is in question was never meant for river boats. So far over 250,000 people have communicated with their various representatives regarding the DQ.

The DQ passes every safety inspection including insurance underwriters. This is not about people with deep pockets trying to bypass legitimate laws. One of the problems in this country is a Congress that makes laws based on stricly political considerations and not what is good for the country. THIS IS A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF THAT SITUATION.

KEEPING THIS ISSUE FORM BEING DEBATED IS A POLITICAL ACT AND NOT ONE HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY. JUST BRING IT TO THE FLOOR.

Your opinion seems to be simply an opinion not based on any relevant facts. If you are sincerely interested in the DELTA QUEEN then check the facts.

One site is:

http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine

/ah/1971/3/1971_3_4.shtml

I would also suggest that you look at the incredible story of the DELTA QUEEN.

Stevepoll

-- Posted by Stevepoll on Mon, Jul 14, 2008, at 3:47 AM

Stevepoll,

While it is just my opinion, it's not totally unfounded.

In the century before passing the law in question, there were literally thousands of lives lost in wooden river boat accidents just between St. Louis and Memphis. Thats not Nationwide, that's just the Mississippi and just that one stretch.

The river is deeper and faster than it used to be. That makes it a little easier to navigate but harder to maneuver and I've been on the river enough to know that only a few minutes without power can get you in real trouble.

Insurance companies will insure anything or anyone if you are willing to pay the price. Has nothing to do with safety.

The law is inclusive. It doesn't say "except for the boats on rivers". Just speculation on my part but I would be willing to bet the intent was to include all "commercially navigable waters" and not ocean vs. river.

The Delta Queen is a fantastic part of history and should be preserved. But it should not be allowed to operate with a monopoly on the market (which is also illegal) and clearly outside the law. As I said before, "change the law or abide by it"!

-- Posted by malan on Mon, Jul 14, 2008, at 10:44 AM

Malan I'll try and conclude this dialogue with the following facts:

The law was not passed due to some losses of life (always a tragedy)in wooden river boat accidents. The DQ's hull is steel. The law was passed specifically after a fire on the "Yarmouth Castle" under totally different circumstances.

Legislators who wrote the law made it plain that they had meant it for saltwater vessels and not riverboats. The Senate passed 3 bills to exempt the DELTA QUEEN--two were unanimous, one by 68-1. These are Senate Bills. The DQ is not operating outside any law.

The DQ's safety is not the issue--as I said before it is SIMPLE DIRTY POLITICS. Rep. Jim Oberstar, who has supported the DQ in the past has suddenly decided to scuttle the DQ by refusing to bring the issue to the floor for discussion--where it would most likely pass.

With all of the intense interest, it his his duty to bring it up not to bottle it up. THIS IS PURE DIRTY POLITICS.

Malan you should spend a little time researching the origin of this controversy and then jumping on board to save the Queen--not scuttle her.

The one thing we agree on is that the DELTA QUEEN is a fantastic part of American history and should be preserved. I agree that laws should be changed--but with all of the support the DQ has received I don't want to see her lost to corrupt politics as is now being practiced. This,in my opinion, is what you should be objecting to .

FOR THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO REALLY KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS YOU CAN VISIT THE AMERICAN HERITAGE.COM SITE:

http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1971/3/1971_3_4_print.shtml

AND:

SAVE THE DELTA QUEEN SITE:

http://www.save-the-delta-queen.org/

Stevepoll

-- Posted by Stevepoll on Mon, Jul 14, 2008, at 9:41 PM

My final comments on this also.

By basic design, an exemption is to allow sufficient time for compliance. In reality they, like most things touched by our governing bodies, have been skewed in every direction. There are exemptions such as this one, that have been renewed over and over. I am of the opinion that the exemption itself is the result of the dirty politics you speak of. It caters to one of the many special interest groups and does nothing for the majority. Just another bargaining chip.

I feel absolutely no urgency in the plight of the "Delta Queen" because this isn't an issue that has suddenly happened (as you imply), you've had 42 years. That should be sufficient.

-- Posted by malan on Tue, Jul 15, 2008, at 8:53 AM

All I know is this boat is a safety issue. I also find it hard to believe that anybody in their right mind would pay thousands of dollars to float up and down the Mississippi and stop at this town. I say ban the boat. If these rich people want to come to this town, they can fly in to that stupid airport in Scott county.

-- Posted by Beaker on Tue, Jul 15, 2008, at 9:46 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: