[SeMissourian.com] Light Rain ~ 42°F  
River stage: 14.42 ft. Falling
Friday, Nov. 21, 2014

Jackson schools avoid budget cuts

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Jackson parents will have to fork over more money for school lunches next year, but they won't see the financial constraints apparent elsewhere.

School districts nationally have had to slash budgets, lay off teachers or cancel programming as utility, fuel and food prices rise. The Jackson School District weathered the increases without forced cuts.

The school board approved a $42.3 million budget Tuesday that funds technology upgrades, the big-ticket purchase of three buses and teacher raises averaging 3 percent. While the district is feeling a financial pinch, increases in state aid and local tax revenue are expected to offset most of the increases in operating costs.

Parents will front part of the increasing school cafeteria bills. A price increase will add 50 cents to the cost of each meal, meaning a family with three children will pay $525 more a year. The district will still be forced to dip into reserves for the second straight year to make the budget balanced.

"I think everyone that goes to the grocery store realizes everything is costing more for us. It's no different for institutions," board president Terri Tomlin said.

Operating expenses are increasing at a rapid rate. The district has budgeted for an 11.7 percent increase in electric costs, a 71.4 percent increase in bus diesel costs, and an 8 percent increase in food costs. Overall revenue is increasing 4.5 percent.

Administrators plan to use $125,000 from operating reserves in the year beginning July 1, less than the $900,000 used this fiscal year. They anticipate an operating fund balance of about 8 percent of total operating expenditures, higher than what the state requires.

Dr. Jim Welker, assistant superintendent for finance, stressed the district is conservative in budgeting. He said the district may not be feeling the severe financial pressures other districts are because "the region is fairly stable in terms of the economy."

The new state funding formula, which is gradually being implemented, will net the district an increase of between $650,000 and $700,000, and local tax revenue has increased from new construction, Welker said.

Parents expressed concern Wednesday about the higher lunch prices and the size of classes. The district has an average teacher-student ratio of 1:21, while the state average is 1:18. Last year's budget provided funding for eight new certified positions, but none will be added this year.

"I believe we'll have one teacher less than last year," Welker said. "We're fairly stable in terms of staffing needs. We could always use more, but over the last several years enrollment has kind of flattened out."

Parent Cassandra Johnston said the increase in lunch prices will hit her wallet. She only has one child in school now, but worries how much she will have to pay by the time her two other children reach school age.

"We don't like to operate in the black, which means we don't subsidize it," superintendent Dr. Ron Anderson told board members, before they unanimously approved the meal price increase.


335-6611, extension 123

Were you there?

Does this affect you?

Have a comment?

Log on to semissourian.com/today

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Maybe, just maybe, if the school district had not so foolishly spent all those thousands and thousands of dollars to cut down and pave the parking lot at the corner of West Jackson Blvd and Oklahoma St just so your football fans and students could have a nice smooth, flat parking lot, they might have had more money to hire more teachers or defer the lunch price increase. My question is, where did the money come from to pay for that parking lot? Was it from that last tax bond? If so, I do not remember that being listed as one of the improvements in that bond. Did anyone stop to ask yourself how much money they wasted moving all the major utilities (after the state had already moved them once with the hwy improvement), cutting the land down and then paving that whole parking lot with concrete and not blacktop? I wonder how many more parking spaces they could have gotten into that lot if they had not put in all those fancy grass islands. I also wonder how much more money was wasted putting in those islands because of the curbing that had to be poured.

Also, I wonder why how much the school district is wasting bussing their athletes to Sikeston everyday for sports camp.

Maybe as tax payers we should be questioning the school district a little closer on what they are spending our tax dollars on.

-- Posted by havefaith1 on Thu, Jun 26, 2008, at 11:05 AM

What the heck does "We don't like to operate in the black" mean? Is DR RON ANDERSON!! miss quoted, or not capable of a reasonable statement. I would also challenge the entire school board to be last in line after the third lunch bell and vote with a clear conscience for a $0.50 raise per meal for what they receive.

-- Posted by JustThink1 on Thu, Jun 26, 2008, at 1:22 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com or semoball.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.


Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.