- Deputies: Man, woman tried to arrange killing of his estranged wife (5/21/17)1
- Cape fines contractor $1,100 a day for street-project delays; contractor blames utility relocations (5/18/17)13
- Attorney general seeks bond revocation for embattled sheriff (5/17/17)3
- Cape police say man assaulted, kidnapped girlfriend (5/21/17)2
- I will not be silenced (5/16/17)4
- Mississippi County sheriff fights efforts in court to remove him from office (5/21/17)4
- Cape man accused of shooting a woman in Jackson (5/21/17)
- Broadening horizons: Heartland Dream Team founder stays committed to area youth (5/21/17)2
- Revival of Oran police board urged amid timecard fraud, nepotism allegations (5/17/17)4
- Business notebook: Woman, sister-in-law buy Perryville custom-wear shop (5/22/17)
The Cape Girardeau County Commission has been trying to deal with a thorny issue: the alleged abuse of a county computer-use policy involving an elected county official. According to various sources, including Auditor David Ludwig's attorney, the commission asked Ludwig to resign last month after the official downloaded what has been described as "inappropriate" photographs from an Internet site and left them in a printer in the auditor's office. The photographs were subsequently found by office employees.
County courthouse sources say this was not the first time this had happened, and Ludwig was asked to sign a document last year promising not to download inappropriate photos and saying he would resign if it happened again. Ludwig said in a closed meeting last month with commissioners and Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle that he did not want to resign. He has been on sick leave since that meeting.
While the issues raised by all of this are of concern to county commissioners, under Missouri law this matter should have been handled by the judicial system rather than as an administrative matter. The county commission does not have the authority to remove another elected county official. And the meetings regarding this situation should have been held -- if at all -- in open sessions, not closed ones.
Any county official who thinks the auditor's actions rise to the level of a crime and warrant his removal from office should take appropriate legal steps, and that does not include closed-door meetings.