- Man shot by police ID'd; witness shares his side of story (2/17/17)31
- Settlement reached in accidental shooting case at Kelly High (2/15/17)10
- MSHP: McLendon shot in side; autopsy refutes witness account (2/19/17)23
- Jackson board votes to demolish high school building if bond issue passes (2/15/17)24
- Cape officer shoots man inside a home (2/16/17)7
- Business notebook: Owners ready to roll out the Barrel 131 (2/20/17)3
- Apparent punch at girls basketball game propels lawmaker into action (2/21/17)4
- Former Cape cop indicted on possessing child porn (2/17/17)
- Man dies after being shot by officer; said to have come at cop with knife (2/16/17)29
- Ray's of Kelso to close, then reopen under new ownership (2/16/17)6
Some voters find their names missing from registration list
Welcome to the first presidential election in which nearly every state must have a list of every registered voter. Here's the catch: If your name isn't on it, you may have trouble casting a ballot in this historic race for the White House.
The lists have already caused problems in New Mexico, Arizona and California, where people waited hours to choose a presidential nominee only to find they weren't listed as registered voters -- or they weren't listed in the party of their choice.
On Tuesday, when folks line up in the crucial states of Ohio and Texas, election observers fret that similar snafus will confuse and delay primary vote counts that could help decide whether the Democratic nominee will be the first woman or the first black man to hold that title.
"It could be the sleeping giant in terms of voting problems," said Larry Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University's law school, which monitors election issues.
The problems stem from a federal law that was supposed to deter voter fraud. Under the Help America Vote Act, every state was required to have a computerized database listing all registered voters. The deadline was 2006, which several states missed. Some of them, including New York and New Jersey, were sued by the Justice Department for not having databases up and running.
This year marks the first time the lists are being used in presidential contests, and every state except North Dakota has some interim or permanent system in place. But there is great confusion about what to do if a voter's name is missing, or shows up under the wrong party affiliation, election advocates say.
The voting law was designed to produce accurate lists of eligible voters that could be coordinated with other government databases, including drivers' license and Social Security rolls. It allowed to states to purge clutter caused by multiple registrations and to eliminate those ineligible to vote -- the dead, for example, and in some states, convicted felons. In 2005, a Seattle woman registered her Australian shepherd-terrier to vote under the name Duncan M. MacDonald -- via mail, with a phony utility bill submitted as identification. She did it, she said, to show how easily noncitizens could register.
Some election officials went too far, according to voting activists, and interpreted those requirements to mean that registration applications should be denied when they don't match government data.
In Florida, the state NAACP chapter and others sued election officials, saying more than 14,000 people, most of them minorities, have had their registrations wrongly denied or delayed since 2006. According to the federal lawsuit, many of the discrepancies were caused by transposed numbers, and confusion over minority names that results in data-input error. Hispanic names can contain maternal and paternal family names, Haitian and Hispanic names can be hyphenated and African-American names can contain unique spellings and apostrophes, the suit said.
In December, a federal judge ordered election authorities to stop enforcing the 2-year-old law, saying there is proof that it has resulted in "actual harm to real individuals." The case is on appeal. "Depending on the decision, it could be an important issue in the general election," said Justin Levitt of the Brennan Center. Florida, which decided the presidency after experiencing recount havoc in 2000, "obviously was important, is important and will be important in any election," he said.
So are Ohio and Texas, two states with significant delegate counts. Hillary Rodham Clinton has pinned her struggling candidacy hopes on winning both primaries on Tuesday. Her Democratic opponent, Barack Obama, has won the last 11 primaries and caucuses and currently leads the delegate count. Primaries also will be held Tuesday in Rhode Island and Vermont.
But Ohio and Texas have had problems getting their registration databases up and running, creating fears that it may take days to tally votes from these important contests -- and Ohio knows a great deal about delays.
In the last presidential election, nearly 3 percent of voters were forced to cast provisional ballots because of registration questions after waiting in lines for as long as 14 hours.
Those paper votes, which take longer to count, helped prolong the final tally by more than a month. On December 6, 2004, then-Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell certified that George W. Bush had won Ohio by about 119,000 votes over John Kerry, a slim margin that handed Bush his second term in office.
Texas faces its own brand of problems -- generated not so much by disenfranchised voters but by fed-up counties. In rural Henderson County, for instance, election officials opted for a privately run database rather than use the state's system.
According to Texas figures, 39 of 254 counties use their own databases.
The state system was "forever going down, having glitches. We couldn't deal with it and operate, too," said registrar Carolyn Craig. "We got tired of dealing with it."
Despite local grumbling, state officials say their database should run smoothly on Tuesday.
"Any problems that were out there have been identified" and corrected, said Scott Haywood, spokesman for Texas Secretary of State Phil Wilson.