- Man shot by police ID'd; witness shares his side of story (2/17/17)31
- MSHP: McLendon shot in side; autopsy refutes witness account (2/19/17)23
- Apparent punch at girls basketball game propels lawmaker into action (2/21/17)4
- Cape officer shoots man inside a home (2/16/17)7
- Business notebook: Owners ready to roll out the Barrel 131 (2/20/17)5
- Former Cape cop indicted on possessing child porn (2/17/17)2
- Man dies after being shot by officer; said to have come at cop with knife (2/16/17)29
- Missouri bill would limit transgender school bathroom access (2/22/17)47
- Annual father-daughter dance provides some fun bonding time (2/19/17)1
- Cape businessman known for starting NARS dies at 49 (2/23/17)9
Ethanol at the pump
The push for alternative fuel for motorized vehicles took an official turn in Missouri with the start of 2008. Missouri became the third state in the nation to require a 10 percent ethanol blend, as long as it doesn't cost more than unblended gasoline.
While many motorists may have thought this requirement would change the gasoline being sold at pumps, most gasoline retailers had made the switch months ago, because it allowed them to sell fuel at lower prices. There was no notice to consumers, because in 2002 Missouri repealed the requirement that pumps dispensing blended fuel be labeled.
The state mandate for the gasoline-ethanol blend was prompted by pressure to find alternatives to petroleum-based fuels. But it also was helped along considerably by agriculture-based groups to spur more demand -- and higher prices -- for corn. The ethanol push also has given rise to the construction of ethanol plants throughout the state. Several are planned in Southeast Missouri.
For now, prices of ethanol are low enough to spur demand, thanks to generous government subsidies. It will be interesting to see how the marketplace responds to this fuel initiative and to other efforts to develop alternative fuels.