Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 65°F  
River stage: 33.87 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (7) Share link

Bar owner will appeal revocation order

Monday, October 15, 2007

The owner of Jeremiah's, a bar at 127 Water St., said Monday he will appeal the order revoking the bar's license.

Donald Ganim, owner of Jeremiah's since the mid-1990s, also said he has the bar under contract to new owners who will take over before the revocation order takes effect Nov. 9.

The state Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control revoked the liquour license for Jeremiah's, 127 Water St., because the bar allowed a minor on the premises after 11 p.m. in violation of special restrictions placed on the license after previous violations, the state's top liquor control official said Monday.

Jeremiah's, which has had at least 10 license suspensions in the past 10 years, will lose its license to sell alcohol Nov. 9 unless the revocation is reversed by the state Administrative Hearing Commission, state liquor control supervisor Peter Lobdell said.

Jeremiah's can also avoid the revocation if another acceptable licensee purchases the bar before that date, Lobdell said.

Liquor control agents caught the minor drinking in Jeremiah's on Feb. 10. An informal hearing on the case was held Sept. 18 in Cape Girardeau, Lobdell said, but no representatives of the bar appeared.

Ganim said that a reporter's call was the first he had heard about the license action. He blamed difficulties with mail deliveries as a possible culprit for failing to appear at the hearing.

The revocation was likely a result of that no-show, Ganim said. "In a nutshell, they took it as a slap in the face that I didn't show up for my hearing. Liquor control has shut me down a dozen times, but they are always fair."

The bar is already under contract for sale to a new owner, Ganim said. The last day of operation under his control is set for Nov. 3, he said.

He intends to also appeal the revocation order. "The only reason I am doing this is to save my name so I can open up something in the future if I want to."

For updates, check back at www.semissourian.com or read Tuesday's Southeast Missourian.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on semissourian.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

What a waste of government resources...liquor control. If the Missouri "18 To Drink" proposal makes it onto the ballot this year, perhaps these bureaucrats will be forced to find something more productive to do with their time.

-- Posted by ScaliaFan on Mon, Oct 15, 2007, at 4:35 PM

Government at work. A february incident is finally being attended to.

-- Posted by interesting on Mon, Oct 15, 2007, at 5:29 PM

I just love how this guy blames the postal service. How trite. The fact is that under his ownership, the place has repeatedly violated the law.

-- Posted by SEMOfan80 on Mon, Oct 15, 2007, at 6:08 PM

Well i under stand the problems with minors drinking but waht is the harm in someone being on the premise if they are under 21. TRUST ME EVERYONE NEEDS A DD. Do i need to say it again so that the goverment and law understands...EVERYONE NEEDS A DD if that means some one being under the age of 21 or 18 so be it. makes the roads alot safer after the bar closes

-- Posted by AHSR4 on Mon, Oct 15, 2007, at 6:48 PM

I for one will not support the "18 to drink" we have enough problems now.

-- Posted by Bruce83 on Tue, Oct 16, 2007, at 9:59 AM

was this minor served or did the minor get the alcohol from the people at the table. why blame the bar if the minor got the drink from the people at the table. i have been down there and got carded and i am over 40 so who's to say that the bar served the minor. for the man wanting to save his name that is what free enterprise is all about buying and selling to make ones life better. that is democracy.

people do need their DD's more than ever no matter if they are 16 or 60 but age shouldn't matter if they are in the bar with a parent. it is the parents who should be in charge not the government.

-- Posted by btrbal on Tue, Oct 16, 2007, at 3:08 PM

Do you know how I know "The Boss" is an idiot? His quote below:

"What a waste of government resources...liquor control."

-- Posted by NoDisclosure on Wed, Oct 17, 2007, at 4:44 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on seMissourian.com, semoball.com, or shethemagazine.com, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists: