- Cape fines contractor $1,100 a day for street-project delays; contractor blames utility relocations (5/18/17)13
- Deputies: Man, woman tried to arrange killing of his estranged wife (5/21/17)1
- Attorney general seeks bond revocation for embattled sheriff (5/17/17)3
- I will not be silenced (5/16/17)4
- Tractors owners to open restaurant in new Drury Plaza Hotel (5/15/17)
- Cape police say man assaulted, kidnapped girlfriend (5/21/17)2
- Mississippi County sheriff fights efforts in court to remove him from office (5/21/17)4
- Attorney general to review request to probe Oran timecard allegations; claims spark denials on Facebook (5/16/17)2
- Man accused of using stolen RV to break into airport (5/16/17)
- Cape man accused of shooting a woman in Jackson (5/21/17)
Senate clears way for Medicare vote
WASHINGTON -- The Senate cleared the way Monday for final congressional passage of landmark legislation to add a prescription drug benefit and a free-enterprise flavor to Medicare, repelling twin attacks by Democratic opponents.
"Today is a historic day and a momentous day," Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said as lawmakers broke through years of gridlock on a bill that would make the most sweeping changes in Medicare since the program was created in 1965.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., said the legislation "starts the unraveling of the Medicare system," and he accused the Republicans of planning a follow-up attack on Social Security after the next election.
A final vote on the bill was set for today, and even opponents conceded the outcome was not in doubt.
Designed as compromise
The legislation was designed as a compromise: new drug coverage for all Medicare beneficiaries long sought by Democrats, combined with a Republican-backed plan to give private insurance companies a vast new role in health care for the program's beneficiaries.
But the bill also includes an additional $25 billion for rural hospitals and health-care providers, a requirement for higher-income seniors to pay more for Medicare Part B coverage and billions of dollars to discourage corporations from eliminating existing coverage for their retirees once the new government program begins.
The bill would satisfy other goals of conservatives, including creation of tax-preferred health savings accounts, open to individuals who purchase high-deductible health insurance policies.
Most controversial of all, the legislation would create a limited program of direct competition between traditional Medicare and private plans, beginning in 2010. Conservatives argue that would help bring down the cost of Medicare over the long run, while critics say it would privatize the program and lead to rising premiums for seniors who remain under the government-designed benefit.
"Modernizing Medicare will make the system better and enable us to say to seniors we kept our promise," President Bush said after visiting Army troops in Colorado.
Supporters of the bill stressed that after years of gridlock, the opportunity to act was at hand.
"If we don't do this at this time, it may be years" before another opportunity comes along, said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, an architect of the bill.
Critics were unmoved. Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle called the bill a "bailout for the HMOs and insurance companies," and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., said the well-being of seniors had been "trumped by the interests of those who have money to make and are taking advantage."
The bill's path to passage was cleared in the Senate on a pair of procedural votes, one predictable, the other uncertain to the end.
First, on a roll call vote of 70-29, 10 more than needed, the Senate voted to limit debate. A few hours later, Daschle failed in a final attempt to halt the bill's progress by invoking arcane budget rules. The vote was 61-39, one more than the 60 that supporters needed. For several minutes before the gavel fell, the tally stood frozen at 58-39, three votes not yet cast, neither side certain of victory.
Finally, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., cast his lot with the GOP leadership. Then Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., did, too. Seeing that Republicans had provided the 60th vote needed, Sen. Ron Wyden. D-Ore., then gave the bill a 61st.
The House had passed the measure near dawn on Saturday on a vote of 220-215.
Drug benefit starts in '06
Under the legislation, the prescription drug benefit would begin in 2006. In the interim, seniors would be eligible to purchase a Medicare-backed discount drug card, at a cost estimated at $35 a year, that the administration estimates would mean savings of between 15 percent and 25 percent off retail prices. Critics argue those estimated savings are wildly inflated.
Lower-income seniors would receive an annual $600 government subsidy for use in conjunction with their cards.
Beginning in 2006, the legislation would allow seniors to purchase coverage for their prescription drugs. GOP officials estimate the premium cost would be $35 a month, with a $250 deductible. The coverage would pay 75 percent of costs after that until a senior's drug costs reached $2,250. After that, there would be a gap in coverage until out-of-pocket expenses reach $3,600, or roughly $5,100 in overall prescription expenses. Above that level, insurance would pick up roughly 95 percent of costs.
The measure includes subsidies for low-income seniors.