|
|
Partly Cloudy ~ River stage: 33.99 Rising Saturday, November 21, 2009 |
Democrats have four interested in vacated House seatWednesday, August 29, 2007Cape Girardeau County Democrats have four potential candidates for the seat opened by Nathan Cooper's resignation, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't consider any others, party chairwoman Brenda Woemmel said Tuesday. Party leaders held a private meeting with two of the candidates last week, Woemmel said. Another meeting will be held soon -- she did not say where or when -- and more may be held before a nominating committee meets to select a candidate. The four candidates include Mike Keefe, retired from 21 years as Cape Girardeau's postmaster, and Matt Hill, a lawyer who challenged Cooper in the 2006 election. The names of the other two candidates, who have not stated their interest publicly, are being withheld, Woemmel said. Woemmel announced the actions to find a candidate during the quarterly meeting of the Cape Girardeau County Democratic Central Committee in Jackson. Party leaders met at the County Administration Building. The party is seeking a candidate for the Feb. 5 special election to replace Cooper. On Aug. 9, Cooper, a Republican, pleaded guilty in federal court to two felony counts of immigration fraud. He resigned Aug. 14 from the Missouri House. Cooper represented the Missouri House's 158th District, which includes most of Cape Girardeau. The three established political parties in the county -- Republican, Democratic and Libertarian -- have the right to name candidates to appear on the Feb. 5 ballot. Candidates seeking to run as independents or under the banner of another party must file petitions bearing signatures of 239 registered voters from the district with the secretary of state's office by Nov. 15. "What we are looking for in a candidate is someone who is willing to work the grassroots," Woemmel told about 30 Democrats gathered Tuesday evening. The closed-door meetings to screen candidates have included past candidates, she said, in order to provide prospective nominees with a clear picture of what it is like to run in Cape Girardeau, which leans heavily toward Republicans. The district hasn't elected a Democrat since 1980. "We are not naive," Woemmel told the committee. "The candidate must be willing to work and be enthusiastic about the race. We will have a good opportunity in this particular office." By putting prospective candidates in a room with past nominees, Woemmel said, the party is giving them a "reality check." "We thought it would be better to make sure people really want to run," Woemmel said. "And I am still taking names of people interested in running." Woemmel explained to the central committee members that only members who live within the boundaries of the 158th District will have a vote on the nomination. The chairman of the 158th District Committee, pharmacist Sam Unnerstall, must set a meeting date within two weeks of receiving official notice of the special election. The Cape Girardeau County Republican Central Committee met Monday evening, and party leaders announced they have no one who is enthusiastic about seeking the seat. Meetings to select candidates must comply with the state Open Meetings Law, which requires posting of notice of the meeting and an open meeting for the selection. In addition, the meeting must be held within the 158th District. The special election will be held the same day as the Missouri presidential primary. While Democrats voting in the 2004 presidential primary outnumbered Republicans, there was little need for Republicans to go to the polls because President George W. Bush was running unopposed. In 2000, when Bush was matched against Sen. John McCain of Arizona in a vigorous contest, Republican voters outnumbered Democrats by more than 5,000 ballots. The candidate seeking the Democratic nomination will need to have a strong ethical sense, Unnerstall said. Any candidate nominated by the GOP will be well-funded, he said, so the candidate must be willing to try to overcome that advantage through hard work. "It is a daily chore you have to go through," he said. "You have to hit it every day." 335-6611, extension 126 Comments |
Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing lists:
|
The democrats in this part of the state will never win another election till they stand up to the state and national party and put up conservative candidates. The facts are most local democrats are just like the republicans they believe in prayer in school,the second amendment, no to gay marriage, and are pro- life. but somehow they always manage to run someone like Tom Nuemeyer[what a joke] or Matt Hill [an even bigger joke] who has very little in common with the vast majority of conservative democrats in this town. The democrats could even run a complete idiot like balou from the tax party and do better than what they have been doing.
i formally state that i will vote for matt hill.... i know him, i pseudo-trust him and i think he will do a better than average job at the state level.... now, where is pete???
conservative democrats.... i like that term.... and i am not kidding.... who would you like to see run as a conservative democrat? lester gooden perhaps? tell me something... and again, how can democrats be "conservative" after the raping of the word? just questions....
The Republican Party: The best politicians that money can buy.
Democrats were the original Conservatives, and at the time of their founding (circa 1860 Abraham Lincoln) the Republicans were the Liberals.
This trend continued following the War Between the States, specifically after Reconstruction.
It was around the era of Roosevelt ( a closet communist) that the Democrats became the liberal party)
Now a days, both parties are trying to out liberal each other.
There are several Conservative Democrats in Missouri, many of whom helped stop St. Louis Muslim representative Talibdin El-Amin's "Slavery Apology Bill" from getting a vote on the House Floor in Jefferson City. (A bill that Cooper and Jetton, as well as House Speaker candidate Ron Richard supported)
It wasn't until the Bob Holden administration did the Democrats lose their hold on our state.
Please read the definition of "Jeffersonian Democrat" at the following link:
http://www.geocities.com/clintlacy1/jeff...
F.A.R.M,
Sir, the perception that circa 1860 Conservative meant pro-Slaver and Republican meant abolition is certainly the general perception.
However; This simply isn't true. Conservative today, meant what it did then. Less government intrusion. less government public works projects, and more states rights.
The War for Southern Independence was not fought over slavery, it was fought because the South was having to pay 47 % of the nations taxes through an outragous import tarrif.
There is no doubt that slavery was an evil, but it was an evil protected by the Constitution. The Republicans only concern was that they received their revenue from taxing slaves as property.
In Stanley K. Lott's book, 'Abraham Lincoln and the U.S. Government' Lott gives the following quote from Abraham Lincoln:
"I intend to make you pay taxes to the Government, which you say you do not owe; you say you are independent (talking abou tthe Southern States) I deny it. You are as uch a part of the Union as you ever were; you are bound to pay taxes; you must let us occupy the forts in your territory"-Year-1861-Cogressional Globe-37th Congress- 1'st session-Image #249
There is also an excellent website that deals exclusively with Northern Slavery called North Slave.Com found at:
http://www.slavenorth.com
In addition I would like to suggest visiting:
http://www.southernheritage411.com
The Democrats, Post-Reconstruction came to power because of the treatment that was given to former Confederates, following the war.
I have written a very detailed article about Abraham Lincoln's overthrow of the Missouri Government that I'd like to invite you to read as well:
http://www.geocities.com/clintlacy1/miss...
Give Southeast Missouri, Conservative Democrats, and they'll sweep the elections once again.
mobushwacker (May I call you mo?):
Thanks! It's amazing how many Americans do not realize (or do not want to admit) that most of the brain-washing history lessons taught in our schools have not necessarily been factual.
Oddly enough, states did have (at least back then) the right to secede. In 1848 President Lincoln said, "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better."
Gurusmom:feel free to call me "Mo" and Good quote from Lincoln. It's interesting to see how his views changed once in the White House. But then again he , like most politicians was an opportunist.