- Man shot by police ID'd; witness shares his side of story (2/17/17)31
- Settlement reached in accidental shooting case at Kelly High (2/15/17)10
- MSHP: McLendon shot in side; autopsy refutes witness account (2/19/17)23
- Jackson board votes to demolish high school building if bond issue passes (2/15/17)24
- Cape officer shoots man inside a home (2/16/17)7
- Business notebook: Owners ready to roll out the Barrel 131 (2/20/17)4
- Apparent punch at girls basketball game propels lawmaker into action (2/21/17)4
- Former Cape cop indicted on possessing child porn (2/17/17)
- Man dies after being shot by officer; said to have come at cop with knife (2/16/17)29
- Ray's of Kelso to close, then reopen under new ownership (2/16/17)6
All eyes on Colorado redistricting court case
DENVER -- A battle over a new congressional redistricting law goes to the Colorado Supreme Court on Monday for a ruling expected to be closely watched around the nation.
Over three hours, the justices will hear arguments focusing on the question of just how often the state's congressional districts can be remapped.
Democratic Attorney General Ken Salazar contends the current plan, written by Republicans, is illegal because the Colorado Constitution calls for redistricting only once every 10 years. Colorado has had two plans in less than two years, one written by a judge, the second by the General Assembly.
A similar once-a-decade argument was raised during Texas' bitter redistricting fight, although recently Texas Democrats have focused on a claim that GOP redistricting plans would violate the federal voting-rights law.
The Colorado court's ruling could signal a trend, said political analyst Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution.
"One bite of the redistricting apple has been the norm for a century, and only if the courts demand revisions do you go back to the drawing board," Mann said.
"If Colorado and Texas are allowed to stand, I don't see what's to stop the process from continuing every election throughout a decade. The idea of relatively permanent, stable districts could vanish," he said.
"No one wants to live in a country where a party can change lines every two years just because it can," said Colorado Democratic Party chairman Chris Gates.
Congressional district boundaries must be redrawn after every census to ensure each district has an equal number of residents.
In Colorado, the Democrat-led Senate and Republican-led House failed to agree on new boundaries in 2002, so the task fell to a judge.
Denver District Judge John Coughlin drew a new 7th Congressional District that was nearly evenly divided among Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters. Republican Bob Beauprez won the seat by a 121-vote margin last year.
When the Republicans gained control of the legislature this year, they approved a map that shifted 27,000 Republicans into the 7th District in Denver's north and west suburbs. At the same time, they solidified already strong Democratic majorities in other districts.
Republicans hold five of the seven seats on Colorado's seven-district congressional delegation.