- Two men seriously hurt in crash near Fruitland (9/21/16)3
- Driver charged with manslaughter in crash that killed 2 (9/27/16)
- Perryville man arrested for alleged patronizing prostitution, harassment (9/23/16)6
- Video and evidence largely confirm trooper's claims in April traffic stop shooting (9/23/16)9
- Cape man may lose eye after shovel beating, police say (9/25/16)2
- Funeral procession of former Cape Girardeau police chief Henry H. Gerecke (9/22/16)17
- Cape man accused of attacking pregnant girlfriend (9/22/16)
- Planning, design puts renovations of H-H building into hotel on hold (9/26/16)5
- Show Me Center upgrades may allow facility to draw more elaborate shows (9/21/16)17
- Woman accused of pushing Wal-Mart employee after theft (9/27/16)
Appeasement isn't the answer
To the editor:
According to Joy Bell, "If security is the goal, we should vote for those who'll demand diplomacy." If history serves me right, diplomacy has been used in an attempt to appease terror before. On Sept. 29, 1938, Neville Chamberlain returned from signing the Munich agreement with Hitler. This agreement was an attempt to appease Hitler's lust for land. At this point, Neville made a statement that reflects the sentiment of the times: "I believe it is peace for our time." As we all know, there was no peace until the fall of the Berlin wall over 50 years later.
Appeasement does not work. in the 1970s, we tried to appease the Iranian hostage holders for 444 days. The only appeasement these Islamic extremists will accept is if we would all convert to Islam and turn Israel over to Islamic rule.
Iran has been watching the world's response to North Korea's nuclear testing, and what do they see? Angry letters and sanctions. This may stop starving North Korea, but extremist Islam is only hungry for the death of the West.
DREW McWILSON and LOGAN BOLLINGER, Jackson