- Jackson man to cast electoral vote for Trump; others trying to dissuade him (11/29/16)51
- Man killed by vehicle had been charged with domestic assault (11/30/16)
- Hotel chain president: City should regulate short-term lodging (11/27/16)16
- Former Cape council member dies, remembered as 'wonderful public servant' (11/29/16)1
- Woman accused in three robberies disguised herself as man (11/29/16)5
- Post-election taunts reported at Jackson schools (12/2/16)24
- Officers: Delta man dies during domestic dispute (11/28/16)1
- Business notebook: New store shows faith in Scott City district (11/28/16)
- Missouri chamber to honor Cape's John Mehner (11/30/16)6
- Men who pulled father, son from burning car near Naylor honored by highway patrol (12/1/16)
Stem-cell plan violates medical ethics
To the editor:
Amendment 2, the so-called Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative, is a deceptive proposal that would establish a constitutional right to clone and destroy human embryos for research purposes, threaten the health of women who donate eggs, allow clones to pay women for donating their eggs by using fertilization clinics as middlemen, create a constitutional entitlement to taxpayer funding of this research and ensure that one industry, human research cloning, is free from any effective legislative or judicial regulation.
I believe this amendment violates long-established medical ethical norms as reflected in the Hippocratic oath, the Nuremberg Code of 1947 (formulated in response to physician and scientist participation in experiment on concentration-camp inmates in Nazi Germany), the World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva (1948) Physician Oath that sought to protect human life from the moment of conception and the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) that provides guidelines for physicians involved in biomedical research on human subjects.
I believe this proposal has no place in our Missouri Constitution and urge you to vote no on Amendment 2 on Nov. 7.
Dr. MICHAEL C. WULFERS, Cape Girardeau