- Few Southeast students face suspension, expulsion for sexual assaults, campus paper finds (4/25/17)5
- Pilot House goes smoke-free (4/23/17)10
- Woman battered after smashing boyfriend's meth pipe against wall, police say (4/25/17)
- Event includes the first public tour of 200-year-old Elmwood Manor (4/23/17)3
- BBB warns Jackson man's online business might not be legit (4/24/17)
- Cape councilman Bob Fox to run for mayor (4/21/17)5
- Cape couple turns their home into cozy, comfortable music venue (4/24/17)
- Perryville family organizing bone-marrow drive Friday for ailing 6-year-old boy (4/26/17)
- Without city record, Marie Street residents on hook for thousands in sewer repairs (4/19/17)7
- Sikeston man charged in shooting death of Cape man (4/23/17)
Unions pushed for wage standards
To the editor:
I would like to respond to a recent Speak Out comment about the minimum wage.
A minimum wage rate of 25 cents an hour was adopted by Congress in 1938. Sixty-eight years later, it has increased 19 times. In 1997 legislation was signed to raise it to its current rate of $5.15 per hour. States have the right to set their own wage rates higher than the federal level. Missouri is not one of those states.
Eight years ago, approximately 16 percent of all wage earners would have been affected by an increase in the minimum wage. I do not agree with the assessment that only 4 percent would be affected today.
Teenagers make up about 7.5 percent of those workers, while women make up a little over 62 percent. Retail trade workers account for the majority of the jobs affected, with the service industry following at a close second.
The comment was incorrect when stating that a raise in the minimum wage is a sneaky way for unions to get a raise without having to negotiate for it. All union contracts are negotiated. Nothing is automatic. The Department of Labor governs what unions can and cannot do. They monitor this closely.
If individuals are fortunate enough to be earning a living wage with decent benefits, they should be grateful to the union workers who have earned those standards for them. They should be thanked, not judged to be sneaky, by those who appear to be unknowledgeable about the subject.
JERALD HILLMAN, Scott City