- New custody law for equal time for dads begins today; some question law's relevance (8/28/16)5
- Marble Hill fires entire sewer department (8/23/16)5
- Ex-Southeast student gets probation for placing homemade sex video on porn site without woman's knowledge (8/24/16)13
- Bootheel lawmaker seeks probe into crop damage by illegal herbicide spraying (8/24/16)1
- Local private school dreams bigger, plans for new building at Sprigg and Lexington (8/22/16)
- Newsmakers 2016: Jason Bandermann (8/15/16)
- 'Santa' suspect Moffat sentenced to 12 years for sexual abuse of girl (8/23/16)2
- Schnucks bans solicitors, including organizations like Salvation Army (8/24/16)38
- Jackson girl stays planted on the farm (8/28/16)2
- Court ruling, state suggest businesses may apply use, sales tax to deliveries (8/24/16)2
When Union Pacific Railroad announced last year that it planned to acquire a segment of track from Rockview to Sikeston through Scott County, officials and residents along the affected area expressed concern, much of it over the additional noise and inconvenience of adding 10 or more trains a day to the route.
The bigger issue is safety. While the federal Surface Transportation Board has yet to review UP's application, the Missouri Department of Transportation has scrutinized the proposal and has recommended several upgrades that could cost millions of dollars. Sikeston and Scott County officials have said they are against the UP's plan, also citing safety reasons.
Part of the problem may have been created by UP itself. After announcing its plan to take over the stretch of track, it pretty much ended any discussions with local officials. The official opposition from those local leaders has grown to include letters from Southeast Missouri's congressional delegation to the Surface Transportation Board that re-emphasize the issues raised by local officials.
Last week, UP decided to change course and reopen its dialogue with area officials. Sikeston's mayor, Mike Marshall, welcomed the offer to discuss the situation but reiterated the city's opposition to UP's plan.
Safety issues cannot be ignored. To allow UP to take over the track without addressing these concerns would be irresponsible. At the same time, local officials could offer suggestions to accommodate UP's traffic.