- Man shot by police ID'd; witness shares his side of story (2/17/17)31
- Settlement reached in accidental shooting case at Kelly High (2/15/17)10
- MSHP: McLendon shot in side; autopsy refutes witness account (2/19/17)23
- Jackson board votes to demolish high school building if bond issue passes (2/15/17)24
- Cape officer shoots man inside a home (2/16/17)7
- Business notebook: Owners ready to roll out the Barrel 131 (2/20/17)3
- Apparent punch at girls basketball game propels lawmaker into action (2/21/17)4
- Former Cape cop indicted on possessing child porn (2/17/17)
- Man dies after being shot by officer; said to have come at cop with knife (2/16/17)29
- Ray's of Kelso to close, then reopen under new ownership (2/16/17)6
The recent dustup over the call by a handful of generals for Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's resignation has had its short life in the news media, and Rumsfeld is still overseeing the U.S. military -- as he should, until President Bush's term ends or the president decides a change is needed.
Cabinet members serve at the pleasure of the president, not the whim of unhappy generals who have described Rumsfeld as curt, dismissive and abusive.
The generals also seem to be overlooking the constitutional and historic role of civilian leadership of the U.S. military. The president is commander-in-chief by virtue of his election. For more than two centuries this command has never been challenged by those in uniform. In addition to a civilian leader, the U.S. military is subjected to oversight and funding by the all-civilian Congress -- many of whom have served with distinction in our nation's military.
The real issue, as with most of the recent media blowouts, is disagreement over the president's course in fighting the war on terrorism and his handling of the war in Iraq. If any general has pertinent information that would untie this Gordian knot, he should be giving advice to the commander-in-chief, not calling for showcase resignations.