- Obama shortens sentence of inmate from Cape (1/19/17)9
- Jackson police describe night of anger, car crashes, drug possession by 18-year-old (1/22/17)5
- Business notebook: Jackson salon owner also opens a clothing store (1/16/17)
- Area hospitals hope a box helps prevent infant deaths (1/19/17)6
- Meat-processing plant faces $70K penalty for Clean Water Act violations (1/17/17)4
- Local students to perform with choir at inauguration (1/19/17)3
- Southeast to lose $3.5 million from state in budget cuts (1/18/17)21
- Subjects of interest in 1992 killing take polygraph tests; results not revealed (1/18/17)2
- Governor cuts $146 million, colleges take hit (1/17/17)
- Comedian, cancer survivor Tom Green headlines sold-out Cancer Center benefit (1/22/17)
Bonds for Mizzou Arena not the same
To the editor:
I read the article comparing the Mizzou Arena bonds to those for Southeast Missouri State University's River Campus. The statement "The University of Missouri project mirrors Southeast's River Campus funding mechanism" [attributed to Mike Lause, counsel for the Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority] is completely false.
The Mizzou Arena bonds are the state's portion of the project. It is not the total cost of the Mizzou Arena. A specific resolution for the Mizzou Arena was passed in the legislature that the state would provide a portion of the project costs as a match for the Laurie gift. The state issued bonds to cover our portion with the first payment occurring this year. The Mizzou Arena was started only after a guarantee of state funding. The River Campus has never received any such guarantee, yet the project was bonded by Southeast without this guarantee. There is no comparison between how the two projects were funded with state support. Any assertion to the contrary is not accurate.
State Rep. CARL BEARDEN, 16th District, St. Charles, Mo.