- City suspends liquor license for downtown Cape bar; owners say they want to fix problems (3/26/17)7
- Mall aboard: Future requires evolution at West Park Mall (3/24/17)24
- Legal discrimination complaint, ethics complaint filed in Scott City government (3/22/17)13
- Former Southeast softball coach sues Board of Regents; seeks damages and her job back (3/23/17)15
- Former Scott City administrator: 'I was forced to resign' (3/21/17)6
- Triplett manslaughter case set for July 2018 (3/21/17)2
- Lawmakers put prevailing wage in crosshairs; laborers object (2/12/17)10
- Chaffee district seeks bond issue for classrooms, property (3/26/17)4
- 'Construction with finesse' (3/26/17)2
- Cramped quarters: April 4 proposition aims to ease crowding in Perry County District Schools (3/23/17)4
Study shows welfare recipients will travel to seek easier bene
STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- Welfare recipients are willing to move from state to state to pursue benefits, but it's not the size of the check that matters, it's how difficult it is to qualify, according to a new study by Penn State University researchers.
Welfare reforms enacted in 1996 created clearer differences between states' eligibility requirements, said Gordon De Jong, a professor of sociology and demography and a research associate at Penn State's Population Research Institute.
"There wasn't a whole lot of change in the welfare-benefit levels, but there were a lot of changes in eligibility rules and what people must do, in terms of behavioral requirements and responsibilities, to qualify or to continue to receive benefits," De Jong said.
"We found that these latter two dimensions -- eligibility rules and behavioral responsibilities and requirements -- make a difference, that people are willing to move from states that are highly stringent or became more stringent to states that are lenient or became more lenient," he said.
U.S. census data
De Jong and his team analyzed the welfare policies of every state, examining requirements for initial eligibility, time limits for receiving welfare, and behavioral requirements, such as requirements for drug testing or treatment, or prohibitions on recipients attending school.
Using U.S. Census data, the researchers were able to track individual welfare cases when recipients moved, either within a state or to a new state.
California, Connecticut, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Vermont and Washington had welfare policies most attractive to outsiders.
Recipients were most likely to leave Arizona, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas.
Already, De Jong said, the data have shown one notable finding: single mothers on welfare are less likely to move than single fathers or two-parent families. He said single mothers were the least likely to have money to pay for a move, and the most likely to rely on personal networks to care for children -- networks that might not be in place at a new home.
"The stereotype is that welfare moms are the most sensitive to benefit levels and their change," De Jong said. "And our findings show that that is an incorrect stereotype."
Lynn Peters, associate professor of social work at Wartburg College in Waverly, Iowa, said the findings were not surprising, but could serve as a wake-up call to states whose policies might be too restrictive.
"In some cases, state welfare programs may have some policies ... that really are a barrier to helping poor people," Peters said. "To me, what this study indicates is that we really need to take a look at those and see if there is some way that we can change policy, help people become self-sufficient so they don't feel they have to move."
On the Net:
Penn State Population Research Institute: http://www.pop.psu.edu/
Census Survey of Income and Program Participation: http://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp/