- Deputies: Man, woman tried to arrange killing of his estranged wife (5/21/17)1
- Former coroner convicted of felony theft now faces prison in misdemeanor case (5/23/17)2
- Police: Woman arrested after meth found hidden in pants (5/26/17)2
- Cape police say man assaulted, kidnapped girlfriend (5/21/17)2
- Woman may lose foot after being hit by moped (5/24/17)
- Illinois Trail of Tears site where Cherokee buried named to National Historic Register (5/24/17)
- Two men face charges in Cape prostitution sting (5/28/17)
- Business notebook: Woman, sister-in-law buy Perryville custom-wear shop (5/22/17)
- Police apprehend Charleston man they say hit Cape woman with car (5/24/17)
- Broadening horizons: Heartland Dream Team founder stays committed to area youth (5/21/17)2
Congressmen seeking DeLay's post claim reform agenda
WASHINGTON -- Each of the three Republican congressmen seeking to replace former Majority Leader Tom DeLay claimed on Sunday to be best positioned to clean up the House in the wake of bribery and influence scandals, and discounted their own ties to lobbyists.
Despite Rep. Roy Blunt's claims that he has the support of a majority of the House's 231 Republicans, Reps. John Boehner and Rep. John Shadegg portrayed the race as active and competitive ahead of the secret balloting during the week of Jan. 31.
The lawmakers defended their associations with lobbyists as appropriate and within ethical guidelines and the law.
The congressmen, appearing on "Fox News Sunday," called for changes in lobbying practices but also a return to the GOP agenda of lower taxes, limited spending and a less intrusive government.
Blunt, Boehner and Shadegg share longtime commitments to conservative ideals and experience in party leadership positions. Each is 56 years old and has been in Congress for at least 10 years -- Blunt since 1997, Boehner since 1991 and Shadegg since 1995.
Shadegg, R-Ariz., sought to turn his rivals' experience against them and claimed that "the level of taint" in his record is dramatically different from theirs. He cited "the long practices that go on in the House that they've had a chance, particularly, to clean up and haven't cleaned up."
"Everybody here is talking about reform, but we're not doing it," said Shadegg, who stepped aside from his position as the No. 5 person in GOP House leadership when he joined the race on Friday.
"I don't think either one of them understands the consequences of the scandals that have hit Washington," Shadegg said.
Blunt, R-Mo., the GOP whip and acting majority leader, claimed to have enough votes to ensure victory. Boehner, R-Ohio, dismissed that contention as based on polling and said that only the secret ballots to be cast by House members counted.
Blunt pointed to what he called a strong finish by the recent Congress and rejected Boehner's charge that the GOP is endangered by the status quo.
"This is not a party stuck in neutral," Blunt said. "This is an opportunity for reform."
Boehner said the question to be answer in the race is which candidate can provide leadership to reform the party and Congress and "renew the confidence and courage of House Republicans."
Changing some of the ways the House does business -- particularly the perception that lawmakers pass legislation benefiting those who have donated to their campaigns and provided perks -- has become a focal point for party leaders.
DeLay stepped aside as majority leader last fall when he was indicted in Texas on charges of laundering campaign funds. He has been closely linked to Jack Abramoff, the Republican lobbyist who has pleaded guilty to conspiracy, mail fraud and income tax evasion.
House Republicans also have been embarrassed by former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham of California, who pleaded guilty in November to charges relating to accepting $2.4 million in bribes for government business and other favors.
The corruption scandals threaten the GOP and its majorities in Congress, said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., "and that's why we're all reformers now."
McCain, appearing on "Face the Nation" on CBS, said changes in lobbying will not be effective until lawmakers stop inserting pork-barrel projects or line items in legislation near the end of the process by which Congress passes laws, a practice commonly called "earmarking."
"Until we fix this earmark system, then you're going to have people who feel, correctly, the only way they can get their project done is to go to a lobbyist who has influence," McCain said.