- Man transitioning to woman killed herself in Cape City Jail in June; news comes from architect's pitch in Kansas (2/15/18)2
- Cape Girardeau businessman proposes redevelopment project; seeks taxing district to fund improvements (2/17/18)16
- Bell City arrest, Scott City incident highlight high-alert status following Fla. school shooting (2/20/18)4
- Plans in the works to save Esquire Theater on Broadway in Cape (2/21/18)1
- TJ's Burgers, Wings & Pizza expands with dining area in Fruitland (2/16/18)
- Pence gets it right in response to attack on Christian faith (2/17/18)6
- Charges filed in Sunday murder; suspects in custody (2/14/18)2
- Lovebirds for 80 years give advice: Trust, patience and 'Tell 'em you love 'em' (2/14/18)2
- Jackson schools purchased former orchard land, will lease for farming for now (2/15/18)
- The heart of the matter: Clinic helps patients rise above congestive heart failure (2/17/18)
A shield for news
Missouri is one of 18 states that provide no special privilege for information gathered by news reporters. Now a shield law has been proposed that appears to have some momentum, with state Sen. Jason Crowell of Cape Girardeau sponsoring such a bill in this year's legislative session. House Speaker Rod Jetton of Marble Hill, Mo., has endorsed the idea.
News-gathering organizations are not above the law and have the same responsibilities as any other law-abiding citizen. But information gathered by journalists has been recognized in 32 states as being privileged under certain -- if not all -- circumstances, particularly when that information is gathered from sources who have been promised anonymity.
The impetus for the proposed Missouri law is driven mainly by what many news organizations see as an abuse of subpoena power by attorneys in lawsuits where it's easy to demand access to what a reporter knows, even if such facts were never reported. In effect, too many lawyers are relying on news organization to do the legwork they should be doing.
The proposed law would provide limited protection for reporters, since it would still allow judges to force reporters to disclose information and sources in certain cases. But any protection from a shield law is a step in the right direction.