- Missing Jackson woman found dead in Bollinger County pond (06/23/16)4
- Many Jackson students may face random drug-testing (06/26/16)30
- Village of Zalma must disincorporate, law says (06/23/16)5
- Jackson man accused of felony assault after attack at Cape bar (06/26/16)7
- Coroner asks for grand jury in Poplar Bluff fatal hit-and-run case (06/28/16)1
- Four men accused of roles in three robberies (06/29/16)3
- Witness says he saw suspect kill his best friend (06/24/16)
- Officials: Ash borer less of a problem here than in St. Louis (06/27/16)
- Cape detective who helped solve Krajcir case is retiring (06/28/16)8
- Police: Cape man kidnapped woman, then raped, assaulted her (06/30/16)5
Protection for Old Glory
Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that desecrating the U.S. flag is protected by the Constitution, there have been attempts in Congress to adopt a constitutional amendment that would permit the passage of a law to prohibit using the flag in unseemly ways. For the fifth time in eight years, the U.S. House last week approved such an amendment. The Senate is unlikely to take up the amendment this year.
From 1968 to 1989, a federal law protecting the flag allowed for the prosecution of those who chose to desecrate Old Glory. Polls continue to show that most Americans favor such a law. But until the Constitution is changed, the Supreme Court's ruling prevents the adoption of any laws prohibiting flag desecration or the prosecution of those who do so.
In a nation of laws, there are arguments that can be made about how a our codified limits on what we can and cannot do are wrong. But Americans have always recognized that reasonable limits for the common good are not only useful, but required.
A constitutional amendment to protect the flag is considered reasonable, useful and needed by most Americans.