- Few Southeast students face suspension, expulsion for sexual assaults, campus paper finds (4/25/17)6
- Perryville family organizing bone-marrow drive Friday for ailing 6-year-old boy (4/26/17)
- Woman battered after smashing boyfriend's meth pipe against wall, police say (4/25/17)1
- Pilot House goes smoke-free (4/23/17)10
- Temptations bassist dies after Cape Girardeau show (4/26/17)2
- Event includes the first public tour of 200-year-old Elmwood Manor (4/23/17)3
- BBB warns Jackson man's online business might not be legit (4/24/17)
- Cape couple turns their home into cozy, comfortable music venue (4/24/17)
- State Supreme Court rules against congressman's mother in dog-kennel defamation case (4/27/17)1
- Sikeston man charged in shooting death of Cape man (4/23/17)
More efficiency in government is best stimulus
To the editor:
I am having a problem understanding the practice of stimulating the economy by income-tax reduction. I can understand that we pay too much tax, but we are operating on a deficit economy. That means money not collected through taxes ends up as an increase in the national deficit. Since the wealthy pay most of the taxes, dollarwise the wealthy end up with the major part of the reduction. Now the investment pool (government bonds) increases by the amount of reduction in taxes plus interest. This, I feel, negates any expected stimulus.
Bottom line: It appears to me that we are swapping interest-bearing government bonds as a refund for taxes. I think the only thing that can stimulate the economy is to improve efficiency in government and industry so that more money is available for expansion.