[SeMissourian.com] Overcast ~ 42°F  
River stage: 14.28 ft. Rising
Saturday, Dec. 20, 2014
Post reply Read replies (37) More threads Create thread

Secrets of Secession: What the Globalists and Bought Off Politicians Fear
Posted by mobushwhacker on Sun, Nov 18, 2012, at 12:44 PM:

This is a very good video by talk show host Alex Jones that explains the REAL motive behind the secession movement. It's about taking our country back.

http://www.infowars.com/secrets-of-seces...

Please watch and then sign the petition for Missouri. Give us Liberty or let us Leave!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitio...



Replies

A whitehouse petition to petition the whitehouse?

-- Posted by Old John on Sun, Nov 18, 2012, at 1:15 PM

Whitehouse.gov has a system in which a citizen can start a petition, if it garners 25000 signatures they have to review it. Missouri is approaching the 20,000 signature mark and should have the 25,000 by the December 10 deadline. What this does is let the Whitehouse know that Americans are not happy with the trampling of the Constitution, the Socialism, the Obamacare etc. In addition it helps educate the people on the concept of secession and has brought the subject to the forefront of the mainstream media. This is just the first step, one of many in the process of taking our country back. Now is the time to stand and sign , and show no fear. Our actions today will help ensure the freedom of future generations tomorrow. It is up to us. As they say, Freedom isn't free.

-- Posted by mobushwhacker on Sun, Nov 18, 2012, at 2:48 PM

I see that Catalonia is considering secedeing from Spain, as well. It seems the secessionist movement is not limited to the United States, and has its roots in the same thing - a people tired of having their pockets picked to support those who aren't carrying their weight.

It'll be curious to see how things turn out over there.

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 8:27 AM

I had done a fair amount of reading about the option of a "constitutional convention" convened by the states. As I understood it then (if memory serves me correctly) it is the states version of direct modifications to the constitution. I believe they were just a few states short of calling for a convention which is clearly outlined in the constitution.

The concerns were you'd have to be careful what you ask for. Such a thing has never been done and the 40% of states run by democrats might try and change the constitution to be more liberal. Another way to deal with the federal government but it has never been done. Some info on it:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_the_US...

There are tons of other sources on this.

-- Posted by Dug on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 12:15 PM

"The concerns were you'd have to be careful what you ask for. Such a thing has never been done and the 40% of states run by democrats might try and change the constitution to be more liberal."

This has long been a concern of conservatives. For example, the left might want to 'clarify' the langauge of the Second Amendment.

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 12:27 PM

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 12:27 PM

Since such a process has never been used to amend the constitution there are no rules written on how it would be set up or managed. Some thought that they could petition each state to agree to a convention on specific items only and that, once convened, no changes may be made to the agenda. Others say that isn't correct. Again, there is nearly nothing written or spoke of in the courts or congress on the matter.

I say convene one and find out.

-- Posted by Dug on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 12:41 PM

Mr Wheels

Was the ink even dry on the constitution when you were in high school?

-- Posted by left turn on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 1:13 PM

"Since such a process has never been used to amend the constitution there are no rules written on how it would be set up or managed."

Amendments are used to amend the Constitution. A convention would be used to rewrite it. That is why the idea of a convention has been treaded upon so lightly for over 200 years.

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 2:05 PM

Mr Wheels

What makes you think I'm a liberal? Because I poked a jab at you?

-- Posted by left turn on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 2:11 PM

In the liberal mind the Constitution is a "living, breathing document". As such, it is not written in ink but in blood, sweat, and tears. If those dry, the Constitution will be dead.

I've never subscribed to the 'living, breathing' idea. It is a law, and laws should not be 'living and breathing. They should be written in ink, not in pencil or chalk, so that they cannot be easily altered. As Walter Williams says, he would never play poker in a game with 'living, breathing' rules, subject to the immediate reinterpretation of the dealer. 'Living, breathing' laws are not laws at all, they are more like Guidelines, as the movie pirates say...

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Mon, Nov 26, 2012, at 2:40 PM

Bye bye yall, wave as you pass the Statue of Liberty.

-- Posted by Dexterite1 on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 6:35 AM

-- Posted by Dexterite1 on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 6:35 AM

Dexterite1 someone must have stolen your ID!!! You normally would say:

"Bye bye yall, wave as you pass the Statue of Liberty. It's Bush's fault".

Call the SEMissourian web folks so you can get your password reset. You've obviously been hacked.

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 8:41 AM

-- Posted by Have_Wheels_Will_Travel on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 10:13 AM

They would turn to Obama and say "where's mine?". Where's my cell phone (Obamaphones)? Where's my food (stamps)? Where's my house (sec 8 housing)? Where's my transportation (taxpayer subsidized public bus system)? Where's my spending money (welfare)? Where's my doctor (Obamacare)?

Same thing, different day.

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 10:28 AM

They would act like those who profit off the military industrial complex and their wars. Where's mine?

-- Posted by BCStoned on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 10:35 AM

They would act like those who profit off the military industrial complex and their wars. -- Posted by BCStoned on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 10:35 AM

Do you really believe that the "military industrial complex" provides zero return to the taxpayer money provided to them? Note the word zero. Of course there is waste and much to be cut. But zero productivity or return?

The very internet we are on wasn't invented by Al Gore. It started as the ARPA net or DARPA net - take your pick - the "Advanced Research Projects Agency" back in the late 60's?

If you are a constitutional libertarian did the Declaration of Independence include a statement about "provide for a common defence"?

Just curious what you think about that...

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 11:20 AM

"...did the Declaration of Independence include a statement about "provide for a common defence"?"

Clearly the answer is no. Why is that not surprising?

-- Posted by commonsensematters on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 11:48 AM

-- Posted by commonsensematters on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 11:48 AM

Do you mean "no" - that clause is not in the dec of ind? or

"no" BC doesn't believe in that clause?

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 12:04 PM

"... that clause is not in the dec of ind?"

-- Posted by commonsensematters on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 1:03 PM

Thanks Wheels. I knew it was in both, just mixed the reference!

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 1:50 PM

Dug, There is no more benefit to the economy from military spending than by common welfare. In each case the money is taken from the producers who could put the money to better use.

Only a Keynesian would think that government would put a person's money to better use than him.

One more thing, the military industrial complex competes with private interests for scarce resources. In other words, it drives up the costs of production.

-- Posted by BCStoned on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 2:19 PM

"Dug, There is no more benefit to the economy from military spending than by common welfare. In each case the money is taken from the producers who could put the money to better use."

It's not a question of whether or not the defense spending is good for the economy, it's a question of whether or not it needs to be spent for defense.

The Constitution empowers the government to fight wars. It charges the government with the necessity to provide for defense, to arm the militia and to maintain a Navy, as well as to raise armies as needed to fight the wars it is empowered to wage.

Yes, it is government spending and as such, its impact upon the economy is usually a negative rather than a positive overall (local economies see it as a boon, but that is at a cost to economies of those from whom the taxes are taken).

Then, again, the benefit of having a secure nation with no war raging in its boundaries, due to the presence and readiness of a fighting force is an immeasurable positive to the economy.

But, as I say, it is a power authorized by the constitution, as opposed to those powers the government has assumed for itself. Fighting wars is a governmental obligation. Paying Granny's medical bills is not.

-- Posted by Shapley Hunter on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 2:34 PM

I know you are referring to the "military industrial complex" as a common term I believe coined by Dwight Eisenhower. The government doesn't "produce" much if anything in the creation of weapons, correct?

Boeing? Northrup? General Dynamics? et al are "private" companies, right? Don't they (and 100's of others) compete for contracts?

All of this assumes that defense of the country is a constitutionally granted power.

-- Posted by Dug on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 3:43 PM

Dug, Defense is a Constitutionally granted power.

Defense is also a drain on the economy same as welfare and my SS check. Defense spending would have less of an impact if used conservatively.

Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics production outside of defense is a positive to the macro economy.

-- Posted by BCStoned on Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 3:53 PM


Respond to this thread

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account , enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


Want to comment?

In order to participate in semissourian.com's forums, you must be a registered member of the site. Once registered and logged in, you can post comments to existing threads or post new threads of your own. Click below to register now (it's free!). If you're already registered, just start commenting and posting threads.