|
|
Fair ~ River stage: 35.52 ft. Rising Wednesday, June 19, 2013 |
|
The Two Faced NRAPosted Sunday, July 1, 2012, at 8:22 PM
7-1-12
There is no doubt that "Operation Fast and Furious" was a terrible and damaging scheme, but who was really behind it, responsible for it and knew about it, still remains unknown. What is obvious is that the NRA saw it as a tremendous opportunity to convince Congress to find Attorney General Eric Holden in contempt, implying that the Obama Administration was lax in curbing gun flow to the Mexican drug cartels. The NRA has spent billions over the years touting the second amendment's "right to possess and bear arms." I agree and would be a member myself except for one thing. We did not have AK47s when the Constitution was written and the NRA refuses to limit their "right to possess and bear" to hand guns and shot guns. In 1986, the NRA backed Owner Protection Act eased regulations of licensees and placed severe restrictions on the US Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearm's ability to weed out illegitimate gun dealers. By 1992, the number of "kitchen table" dealers in the US ballooned to 245,000. This huge loophole in the federal law exploited high volume criminal gun trafficking.
In 1992, President Clinton implemented a law requiring licenses to be issued only to those engaged in the gun sales business. Later Brady Bill was passed but unfortunately, neither excluded "gun show sales" so illicit gun sales exploded in Arizona and drug cartels in Mexico were our major customer. In May, 2012, Attorney General Holden and the Obama Administration imposed a new federal regulation to stop the flow of guns across the border. It requires all gun merchants in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas to report anyone buying more than one assault weapon. The Attorney General feels the measure is appropriate and will stop the flow of guns from United States to Mexico.
Now, the NRA, who insisted on punishing Attorney General Holden for allowing guns into Mexico, is suddenly violently opposed to the measure restricting traffic of AK47s and assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartels. The NRA has filed a lawsuit challenging the new regulation and has vowed to fight the measure all the way to the Federal District Court (Wayne La Pierrie, executive VP of NRA). It is obvious that the NRA does not want to stop the flow of assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartels. Assault weapons are big business. US citizens should realize that when they join the NRA they are not just defending their right to bear arms. They are promoting the sale of assault weapons which mass murder innocent people and increase the flow of drugs into the United States.
P.S. If you wonder how the NRA has been so successful weakening gun laws, defending the right to bear arms and now getting Congress to find Attorney General Holden in contempt, you might consider the following. Recent NRA contributions include: $432,288 to Republicans for Re-election and $43,450 for Democrats. During the 2010 election cycle, the NRA spent $7.2 million primarily supporting Republican candidates or opposing Democrats for a 12 year total of $2.9 billion. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Government Problems ![]() - Archives - Blog RSS feed - Comments RSS feed - Send email to Jack H. Knowlan Sr. - Login Jack H. Knowlan Sr. is a graduate of Texas A&M University in Agriculture in 1942. He served in the U.S Marine Corp as a 1st Lieutenant in Guadalcanal, Guam and Iwo Jima in WWII until 1945. He was employed by Stauffer Chemical Co. as a sales
representative in 1956 and as regional sales manager from 1973 until he retired in 1982. He was very successful and his region and was top in the U.S. in R.O.I. During his years with Stauffer he also successfully also owned and operated Knoll Crest Orchard. After retirement in 1982, he owned and operated Knoll Crest Limousine, raising registered Limousin bulls and registered Spotted Saddle Horses. Jack Knowlan is a diversified person being knowledgeable in government and corporate operations. His other interests are music and gardening. Topics he will write about in his blog include: free trade -- a double edged sword; plutocracy; What happened to democracy? and Where Our Dollars Are Going.
|
So, since the internet and cheap printers didn't exist in 1789, you probably shouldn't be able to use this media to speak your mind, right? I mean, the technology wasn't even a hope in the future at that time, unlike repeating firearms which did exist, albeit in a much more primitive form. Going by that reasoning the AK47 is more likely to be protected by the Constitution than the internet.
By the way, Operation Fast and Furious was never intended to track the firearms to the cartels. First, the leaders of the cartels don't get their hands dirty with personally shooting victims. Second, most of the firearms they have come from farther south or from deserters from both the police and the military (those guns were likely made in and sold by the US, but are never tracked because the Mexican government knows exactly where they came from). Third, the Mexican government wasn't made aware of the program and so weren't able to assist with the tracking, if that were even attempted.
The problem here is the current administration, not the NRA, for trying to justify more infringement on one of our fundamental rights.
Why can't you just stop? I mean, what is it about plain English that escapes you?
"Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment. We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997) , and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35--36 (2001) , the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding." - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (No. 07-290) 478 F. 3d 370, affirmed.
Stop with the crap. Accept your defeat and move on.