|
|
Partly Cloudy ~ River stage: 34.01 Rising Saturday, November 21, 2009 |
|
Winder feeling confident in 156th District
Posted Sunday, August 24, 2008, at 7:17 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Michael Winder, the ironworker who took 43.5 percent of the vote against House Speaker Rod Jetton in the 156th District Missouri House race in 2006, said he's feeling confident of victory this year.
Winder, in an interview at the SEMO Labor Picnic, said raising money is easier this year. Running for an open seat — Jetton is term limited and must leave the House — helped open up the checkbooks, he said. So far, Winder has raised $28,000 for the contest. He had $2,300 on hand just before the primary election. Shelley Keeney, the district aide to Jetton who is the Republican nominee, has raised $34,000 and had $27,800 on hand just before the primary. "Last time going against the Speaker of the House, nobody gave me much of a chance," Winder said. "I opened their eyes up. Now, a whole lot of people expect me to win." Winder, of Marquand, Mo., reports to work most days at the Holcim cement plant construction site in Ste. Genevieve. That limits his campaigning time, he said, but he's not complaining. Winder's running as a pro-life, pro-gun Democrat and hopes when voters understand there is no difference between he and Keeney on those issues, they will look at his economic and other platform planks. "A lot of people say Democrats are for taking away guns and abortion," he said. "The majority of us are not." "A lot of Republicans are more liberal than I am," he said. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Rudi Keller is a reporter with 19 years experience covering government from city councils to the Missouri Legislature and politics from school board races to statewide political campaigns. A native of Louisville, Ky., Keller has worked at the Southeast Missourian since July 2005.
Hot topics Cape GOP chairman Voss questions Sowers ties to Texas Obama supporter(
Sowers raises money with Sen. Bob Kerrey and earns praises from Paul Begala
Gerald Jones spews expletives at college reporter
Emerson viewed as role model for Palin
Smoke for a healthy America
|
I heard Michael Winder speak in 2006. He will make an excellent representative for all citizens living in the 156th.
He is pro-life, no doubt about it. He is very pro-gun. Not that wishy-washing, "I believe in guns for sporting purposes" nonsense, Winder believes in our FULL Constitutional rights to own and bear arms.
If I had known that he was at the picnic on Sunday, I would have given him money for his campaign. It is time that we have decent, "loyal to the people" representatives up in Jefferson City.
It is our own fault that we have had the friends of special interests in Washington and Jefferson City. After all, they wouldn't be there, if we hadn't voted for them.
Time for Michael Winder to represent us, and I mean, "REPRESENT" us. He will. You can count on it.
The headline is a little misleading. Mike is confident but it is important to stress that he is not OVER confident.
The biggest thing working against his oponent Shelley Keeney is the fact that Rod Jetton is her treasurer.
Winder is right, he is more conservative than many republicans.
A good example of this was Talibdin El-Amin's "Slavery Apology Bill".
This bill received the backing of Republicans Rod Jetton, Nathan Cooper and Scott Muschany.
Cooper was later convicted of immigration fraud and early this month Muschany was indicted in connection with a sexual assualt on a 14 year old girl.
One has to wonder if El-Amin new about Cooper and Muschany's problems, and used it to his advantage to receive their support.
If, and I am saying, if this is the case, one has to wonder what he has / had on Rod Jetton.
What the voters of the 156th district must ask is this:
Given the fact that Jetton is taking an active roll in Keeney's campaign and is no doubt influential in her views on issues, do the voters of the 156th district REALLY want to continue the connection between elected officials and criminals?