*
The Irony Of It All
Brad Hollerbach

No Smoking? How About Adults Only.

Posted Wednesday, April 6, 2011, at 12:00 AM

Comments

View 10 comments or respond
Community discussion is important, and we encourage you to participate as a reader and commenter. Click here to see our Guidelines. We also encourage registered users to let us know if they see something inappropriate on our site. You can do that by clicking "Report Comment" below.
  • The ban did not pass. It failed.

    -- Posted by sephora on Wed, Apr 6, 2011, at 10:46 AM
  • NOTE: I wrote most of this blog on Sunday with the assumption that the Smoking Ban would pass in Cape Girardeau. As I edit this on Tuesday night, that is obviously not the case. However, there's no point in wasting a perfectly good blog even if one fact happens to be wrong...

    I just read this. Even if one fact happens to be wrong...the most important fact.

    -- Posted by sephora on Wed, Apr 6, 2011, at 10:48 AM
  • Since it is virtually impossible to screen people for maturity, Bloody, I'm afraid age will have to be the only yardstick for an adults only restaurant section.

    OK, you got me there, Sephora. It's not what one would call a "minor" detail...

    Thanks for reading.

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Wed, Apr 6, 2011, at 11:04 AM
  • How about the Smoke Free Cape Committe paying the American Cancer Society the $83,000 back.

    -- Posted by retired1 on Wed, Apr 6, 2011, at 8:25 PM
  • Wait till next time(2012)we will GETER done. Thats when all the smart people will come out to vote.

    -- Posted by jackson88parent on Thu, Apr 7, 2011, at 11:10 AM
  • The restrictive smoking ban was voted down in Cape for the following reasons;

    1) A person's business that they have put their life and money is not a "public place" and the goverment should be very careful about puting restrictions on a legal activity on you private property.

    2) This was in no way a "local effort". The campaign was waged with corporate money from a lobbying group attempting to sell their products with the goverment's help. It was run from their PR agency in the East. Their first two spokespersons were not residents of Cape and when that was pointed out they "dissappeared".

    3) citizens are very tired of goverment interference with their daily lives and the gradual erosion of their rights. While it's undoubtly true that "the right to smoke" is not specifically mentioned in the constitution, it would have been ludicrous to propose since tobacco was used for currency at that time and was the country's largest export. Like it or not,we still have the FREEDOM to smoke in this country!

    4) All the claims about second-hand smoke are bogus and the "studies" are paid for by BIG PHARMA. OSHA says that second-hand smoke has 1000 TIMES less carcinagens than their LOWEST standards.

    -- Posted by riverdog on Thu, Apr 7, 2011, at 11:33 AM
  • Tisk, tisk. Hit too close to home, eh?

    -- Posted by slim_pickens on Thu, Apr 7, 2011, at 11:41 AM
  • The ACS will return. Their money is endless;-http://www.preventcancer.com/losing/acs/wealthiest_links.htm----

    -- Posted by generalsn on Fri, Apr 8, 2011, at 10:44 AM
  • Brad, Looking forward to your "perspective" on the man v. automatic dump truck, should be a good one. ;-)

    -- Posted by ncis on Mon, Apr 11, 2011, at 2:20 PM
  • Loved your blog, Brad! You're always an enjoyable 'read.' Have to appreciate anyone with such a great sense of humor. Thanks!

    riverdog's comments good, especially ... "citizens are very tired of goverment interference with their daily lives and the gradual erosion of their rights." This might have been evidenced by those non-smokers who were against the ban.

    We've lost, over the last several decades, without realizing it, many rights ... slowly and 'justifiably.'

    -- Posted by gurusmom on Mon, Apr 11, 2011, at 2:44 PM