*
The Irony Of It All
Brad Hollerbach

Paying Down My $32,000,000 Lowe's Charge Card

Posted Wednesday, March 31, 2010, at 12:00 AM

Comments

View 8 comments or respond
Community discussion is important, and we encourage you to participate as a reader and commenter. Click here to see our Guidelines. We also encourage registered users to let us know if they see something inappropriate on our site. You can do that by clicking "Report Comment" below.
  • I understand your 'love/hate' relationship with Spring. I have it too. See ya at Lowes!

    -- Posted by honeybee on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 3:47 AM
  • While this is a parable regarding the upcoming Cape Girardeau school bond issue, there is more than a little truth to this story. I've had a charge account at Lowe's since they opened and doubt that a month has gone by that I haven't used it for something.

    Thanks for reading.

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 8:09 AM
  • Well played Brad! Do you think they got the point?

    -- Posted by jcwill on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 8:44 AM
  • Good attempt and creative, but you're not comparing apples with apples.

    -- Posted by Scott Horrell on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 12:44 PM
  • JCWill, I doubt that what I write will make a bit of difference to anyone. Most people have already made up their mind.

    I know it's not exact, Scott, but here is where I see the similarity. By never sunsetting a bond issue and continually renewing it, it's like a revolving charge card which you constantly keep a balance on.

    I realize that school districts require maintenance and sometimes very expensive maintenance like HVACs, electrical upgrades and new roofs. No building is maintenance free forever.

    I wish we had a bond issue dedicated to just building maintenance (I'm for that), and when legitimate capital needs were actually needed that separate bond issues would address them. I don't like laundry list bonds like this one. There are too many items that I feel are either unneeded (based on the population of the district), are there for some special interest group or outright not pertinent to education.

    Thanks for reading.

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 2:22 PM
  • Brad,

    I see that part of the analogy as far as the credit goes. The difference is that you have a job to earn money to pay for that credit that went for making your yard nice which only you have use of and enjoy. The school district depends on public funds to operate. They cannot increase sales, work more hours etc. to raise the funds to cover expenses for public use.

    -- Posted by Scott Horrell on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 5:30 PM
  • That is true. Although this bond issue is not for operational funding, but for capital improvements and maintenance.

    I do find it funny regarding the phrase "public use." Considering today's hyper-security state of mind (a chunk of this bond issue is being used to beef up security at all the schools) can the general public -- i.e. those who are not students or parents or faculty -- even USE the schools?

    For instance, what if someone wanted to hold a baby shower. Could they do so in a classroom on the weekends?

    I don't know. My gut says probably not, which means the operationals definitional of "public use" is a narrowly defined "public."

    TFR

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 5:47 PM
  • The school does not discriminate as far as it's indended purpose which has never been implied that something like a baby shower would be appropiate use. If you just gotta do one there look into it. Would it be appropiate to use the court house for a biology lab? It's a public building. Not its intended function.

    Yes the bond issue is for facilities only which frees up money in the operational budget to do the "educational" things instead of addressing building and maintenance issues so much.

    -- Posted by Scott Horrell on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 6:57 PM