*
The Irony Of It All
Brad Hollerbach

I Was Wrong About 'Wayfinding'

Posted Friday, January 22, 2010, at 1:30 AM

Comments

View 8 comments or respond
Community discussion is important, and we encourage you to participate as a reader and commenter. Click here to see our Guidelines. We also encourage registered users to let us know if they see something inappropriate on our site. You can do that by clicking "Report Comment" below.
  • Funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by ParkerDaws on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 8:59 AM
  • based on that. . .they should have went with a firm located here in missouri.

    -- Posted by Bushman_212 on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM
  • based on that. . .they should have went with a firm located here in missouri.

    -- Posted by Bushman_212 on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 12:41 PM
  • I agree with you, the City could feasibly skip this "review" process, save the $40K - select one of these firms to complete a full signage concept for bid, and apply the $40K to the cost of implementing the concept... Why review once, then review again - and pay for it twice ? Will be "interesting" to see who is selected.

    -- Posted by jacksonjazzman on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 12:47 PM
  • Perhaps I wasn't clear jacksonjazzman. The bids were solicited this past July and the Orlando firm was picked to do the wayfinding study which the City Council approved about October 5.

    The reason I included this information in this blog is because the information has never before been shared publicly.

    The selection process for the wayfinding study had more to do with "perceived" qualifications of the bidders by the selection committee than low bid.

    I don't know the exact specifications of this federal grant, but it looks to me that the city could spend "up to forty thousand dollars" on a wayfinding study and only on a wayfinding study. That's why two of the four bids were exactly $40k and the others were darn close.

    While, I can't speak of the qualifications or have knowledge of 3 of the 4 bidders, I have worked with Kiku Obata out of St. Louis.

    That firm was responsible for the redesign of the Southeast Missourian building when it went through a complete remodel a few years ago. They did a fine job at re-imagining a 1920s building for use in the 21st century.

    I think they would have done a good job designing some really, really nice signage for the city.

    Thanks for reading.

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 1:58 PM
  • Perhaps,that was one of the bid specifications, Just me.

    "Signage that doesn't suck." That would be a refreshingly honest contractual request, if you ask me.

    Of course, sucking is in the eye (mouth?) of the beholder.

    TFR

    -- Posted by Brad_Hollerbach on Fri, Jan 22, 2010, at 2:50 PM
  • How the heck did the Corps of Discovery ever find anything?

    -- Posted by IonU on Sat, Jan 23, 2010, at 10:00 AM
  • Ok soliciting a Not To Exceed proposal is sort of like going to the car lot and telling them what you are willing to pay per month for a vehicle.

    1st the sales manager closes the door and they add every dealer option available (ie: undercoating, extended warranty, etc.) then they manipulate the number of months for repayment until it aligns with the monthly payment you requested.

    Why was there a NTE amount included, another one of those spend it or loose it situations?

    Are there no firms in Cape County that could handle this project? If so were they supplied with a NTE proposal package, if not why?

    Was Hollerbach Enterprises approached with a NTE proposal?

    -- Posted by Cutlass1964 on Sat, Jan 23, 2010, at 11:51 AM