Marketplace    Homes    Jobs    Classifieds    Coupons
[SeMissourian.com] Fog/Mist ~ 44°F  
River stage: 33.68 Rising
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Separating the good from the bad in digital cameras
Posted Thursday, July 9, 2009, at 1:21 AM
<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>

(Photo)
A display of digital cameras is seen in an electronics store. While picking the right camera for you comes down to your personal preference, there are some things to look for when making your choice.

In previous entries, I've written about how to select electronic devices such as laptops, desktops and televisions. Next up on my list of major electronics most people purchase at one time are another are digital cameras. However, unlike computers, it's tougher to describe what makes one camera better than another, especially because the available technology has advanced beyond what any average user could ever need. Still, there are some things to look for while shopping that will help narrow your search.

There are two broad categories of digital cameras, DSLR cameras and point-and-shoot cameras. While DSLRs are generally preferred by professional photographers, the advantages offered are going to be over the head of the average user. For the majority of people, a point-and-shoot camera will be more practical anyway, as they're generally smaller, less expensive and less complicated to use. So for the purposes of this entry, I'll only be looking at point-and-shoot models. Anyway, in all honesty, if you need a DSLR you probably know more about cameras than I do anyway.

Once upon a time, a major consideration when shopping for a digital camera was how many megapixels it had, a number used to describe the quality of the pictures a camera can take. When cameras were only about 2 or 3 megapixels, maximizing this spec was important. After all, a photo taken with a 2-megapixel camera just isn't going to work as an 8-by-10 print. But now, it's a different story. There are a few 5 megapixel cameras left out there, so I would shy away from those. Having 7 or 8 megapixels will be fine for most people, and 10 megapixels -- what most cameras are nowadays -- will be more than enough for nearly all uses.

Digital zoom is another specification that doesn't mean anything. When you use a digital zoom, the camera is simply cropping the photo for you. It's better to just take the picture as is and crop it later using whatever photo editing software you have access to -- the camera should come with its own, and all computers come with basic software as well. That way, you can crop it the way you want it later rather than trying to do so on the fly when the action is actually taking place.

Optical zoom, however, is another matter. This is when the focal length of the lens itself changes, more akin to using a magnifying glass than just cropping the photo as with a digital zoom. There are two types of optical zoom lenses -- those with a fixed length and those that change length -- but with the advent of auto-focusing cameras, they are essentially the same for average users. You'll want to look for the highest optical zoom factor you can get based on the size you want -- generally a more powerful optical zoom will require a larger lens, as fixed-length lenses can only accomplish so much. Looking for at least a 5X optical zoom is a good starting point, but you may save money if you're willing to accept less.

You'll also want to keep in mind the storage media and batteries a camera uses. Many cameras use AA batteries, rechargeable or standard, but others use specialized battery packs. If that's the case, it means a dead battery will put you out of commission until you recharge it, so I would recommend going with a model that can use AAs for on-the-go use. As for storage, SD/SDHC cards are fairly standard, so I would shy away from the larger CompactFlash memory or the less common xD-Picture cards. This is especially true if you have a newer computer or television, many of which have built-in slots for SD cards.

The final specification that will make a difference to the average user is the video recording capabilities of a camera. While a dedicated video camera will almost always beat out a still camera, that line is blurring in some cases. The two things to keep in mind on this one are the maximum recording resolution and the maximum clip length. You're unlikely to get full 1080p on a digital camera that's not a DSLR, but 720p is becoming fairly common and will be just fine for most users. While that will still eat through available memory quickly, it can be downgraded to lower quality to allow for longer clips. Many cameras will allow you to continue to shoot video until you run out of memory, but some place a cap on video, usually about 30 seconds. Avoid cameras that place this sort of artificial restriction on your ability to capture a moment.

Beyond these tips, much of buying a camera comes down to personal preference, so you'll want try out a lot of models in a store. How slim and light do you want it to be? What sorts of additional features (face detection, smile detection, burst mode) are you interested in? How easy is it to navigate the menu system to find the options you want? Take the time to read some expert reviews online about the models you are considering -- even cameras that may seem similar can have make-or-break differences you may not notice after a few minutes of use in a store.

Just based on a quick search, I found the Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS to be a good balance of price and features. It may be a little bulky for users who want to slip something thin into a pocket, but it will definitely deliver all the performance most people need. If you do want a slim camera, there are a lot out there, but recognize you're probably going to have to settle for a less powerful optical zoom and a proprietary battery pack. Speaking of proprietary hardware, Sony cameras eschew SD/SDHC cards for their own Memory Stick format, which is reason enough for me to avoid the brand. But in the end, it's your call what will work best for you. Looking to save some cash and still get a good camera? Check out KEH Camera for a great selection of used cameras. And hey, there's always eBay. Enjoy your search!


Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

I used to prefer AA or replaceable batteries in my cameras, but the battery life on the proprietary batteries has grown so long that I'd switched my view.

Yes, it's great that you can pop into any convenience store and grab a battery if you need it, but I've never run out of juice with my Nikon D40, even when I've shot as many as 500 pictures between charges. I don't even own a second battery.

The biggest drawback with most point-and-shoots is shutter lag. I liked the size of my Canon P-A-S, but I never got what I wanted when I pushed the button.

It's one thing to try for the decisive moment; it's another to factor shutter lag into the equation.

I also hate cameras without viewfinders. When you have to hold the camera at arms length to look at a tiny LCD screen that's washed out in bright sunlight, you're praying and spraying, not photographing.

-- Posted by Its_me on Thu, Jul 9, 2009, at 7:05 AM

I can point out a hundred reasons that I shoot with a DSLR, but I agree with Tyler that they are impractical for most users.

One thing that I would mention that wasn't covered is the lens. The quality of lens makes a huge difference in the photo quality and there is no way to measure that. Before Sony started using Zeiss lenses, thier cameras way underperformed cameras with similar specs.

I like the Canon G10 and a Panasonic (I can't think of the model number) for point and shoot cameras. Neither are cheap, both at the $500 price point, but both have performance that matches entry level DSLR models but without the DSLR drawbacks.

What I consider DSLR drawbacks are: the bulk, changing (and purchasing lenses), you aren't getting serious benefits unless you are shooting manual (or shutter/aperture priority) and intimidation. They can be intimidating for a novice to operate and they are certainly intimidating to the subject. People are more comfortable when someone is shooting them with a compact camera.

The shutter lag isn't nearly as bad as it used to be. If you are shooting basketball any shutter lag is too much.

-- Posted by bobby62914 on Thu, Jul 9, 2009, at 8:26 AM

I personally use a Nikon D40X and love it. It can make any amatuer photographer look like a professional. And we can easily blow up a nice photo and print it out 13x19inch on our professional canon printer without loosing any quality in the photo.

-- Posted by BadMomma on Thu, Jul 9, 2009, at 4:32 PM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


Portal
Tyler Griesenbrock
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Tyler Griesenbrock is a copy editor for the Southeast Missourian. Tired of reading yet another story about the poor state of the economy or the everyday minutiae of government business, his focus in Portal is on much cooler topics related to science and technology. A new entry will be posted at least every Thursday as long as blogging can sustain his interest.