|
|
Fog/Mist ~ River stage: 33.56 Rising Saturday, November 21, 2009 |
|
Boehnercare: A More Affordable Option for Real Healthcare Reform
Posted Friday, November 6, 2009, at 8:01 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Recession...10.2% unemployment...credit crunch...sounds like the perfect time to spend a trillion dollars doesn't it!
While Speaker Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Reid and others want to take over 1/6th of our economy, House Republicans have responded to the call of the American people to introduce real healthcare reform.
Tuesday, House Republican Minority Leader John Boehner released the Republican alternative healthcare bill which cuts the deficit by $68 billion over the next 10 years according to the Congressional Budget Office. In contrast to the Pelosi bill, this legislation does not cut Medicare, raise taxes or recklessly spend taxpayer dollars that will put generations in an unrecoverable debt.
Boehnercare tackles the affordability issue of healthcare from several directions. Five of the ten major components to this legislation deal with lowering health insurance premiums--both on a short and long term basis.
By reforming the state high risk pools, those with pre-existing conditions will have access to health insurance. As a result, private health insurance premiums would decrease since the financial risk will be diminished for private insurers.
Economic damages would have no limit under this bill. However, punitive damages would be capped at $250,000. Frivolous law suits would also be thrown out under this bill through limiting ongoing litigation. On a long term basis, this reform would reduce healthcare costs through the decrease in defensive medicine (PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates there is $210 billion spent yearly on defensive medicine).
Through membership in a trade organization, industry association or another deemed "sponsor", small businesses will be allowed to pool together and buy health insurance at a much reduced cost. Single handedly this is the best part of the legislation. In contrast to companies that employ a large number of individuals, small businesses have an adhesion contract with insurers. This legislation puts small businesses on a level playing field with their larger counterparts by giving them a much stronger bargaining power.
Under this legislation, individuals would be allowed to purchase health insurance across state lines. Currently in many states, and in some cases regions, individuals are extremely limited in their choice of insurers. Competition works. Regardless of the industry, the more choices consumers have the better price they stand to receive. Healthcare is no different.
Health Savings Accounts are a great thing. However, if premiums and deductibles are astronomically high, there is virtually little use for a $5,000 HSA. However, under this legislation, Health Savings Accounts can be utilized to pay for premiums of policies with high deductibles.
This legislation will cut the deficit, make healthcare more affordable, and it will never ever make it to the floor under this Congress.
Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
A Look at State and National Policy ![]() - Archives - Blog RSS feed - Comments RSS feed - Login Lucas Presson is an MBA student in the Harrison College of Business at Southeast Missouri State University. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree (Cum Laude and Academic Distinction) from the university. Presson is also a health policy research assistant in the College of Business.
Hot topics "If You're Happy and You Know It"(
Boehnercare: A More Affordable Option for Real Healthcare Reform
Tort Reform: A Must for Comprehensive Healthcare Reform
|
Elephants and *****
Screwing the masses
Lucas, keep it up. It's time for the little 'r" republicans to stand up & demand that our goverment function within its constitutional powers. Taking over private sector businesses & mandates for citizens steps way outside of the limits of its power.
This approach is certainly better than the bill that Dems are pushing thru.
It's time that we all make our voices heard and elect those who believe in the Constitution as it was originally intended.
The government that governs best is the one that governs least.
I would also like to see an increase in the number of local hospitals in order to drive competition. If there are laws that prevent that from occuring, we need to change those. We also need to look at increasing the supply of providers. More medical schools and larger numbers of medical students would be a logical place to begin.
Dissolve the FDA.
Allow competition between accreditation agencies and the government in issuing medical licenses, or simply eliminate the license requirements all together.
Just a couple of suggestions from a small "l" libertarian.
I do agree with the small "r" republican regarding the deregulation of the health care industry.
Yes, thank God for insurance companies, screwing their customers and making obscene profits, just like our Founding Fathers intended when they wrote the Constitution.
"This legislation will cut the deficit, make healthcare more affordable, and it will never ever make it to the floor under this Congress."
um... what did your Grand Old Party do when they had control of everything in Washington? Lined their pockets and started two wars, which suck money out of this country at an alarming rate.
Come on now, if you are getting an MBA then you know what it takes to run a business: increasing return on investment.
The Republicant's scream about rights of the unborn and how they know how to fix health care, yet did nothing when they ran the show.
FSM06,
Actually Insurance companies earn about a 5% return on their investments. Wal-mart earns 9% and Dell Computer 12%.
If current restrictions are removed to allow for real competition the premiums would certainly drop and make insurance more affordable.
The House bill mandates several things for both employers and individuals. These mandates were not what the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution. The Federal government was to only have those powers specifically listed,not to have the power to do anything those in office think is "good for the people".
Boehner's an idiot.
Egotistical_Bigot,
How did you arrive at that conclusion?
Insurance companies make profits off of people dying. Wal-Mart and Dell make profit off of selling merchandise. If you can't see why one is different than the other, God help you.
The Founding Fathers had no concept of the modern health care system, and the Constitution was deliberately left vague in order to allow adaptation. The wingnut contention that federal health care is somehow a threat to our liberties is asinine. The VA system and Medicare are also federal health care systems, and no one seems to think that they're unconstitutional.
If the Constitution is a living document that can be used as justification for any legislation that the government deems necessary on a whim at any moment, then it is also a completly useless document.
FSM06
I was just trying to point out that many other companies make more profits than the "obscene" profits of the insurance companies.
No one said that the VA or Medicare are unconstitutional. What is unconstitutional are the mandates in the current bill that force everyone to have insurance and forces employers to provide insurance to their employes.
Many are concerned on the ever increasing involvement of the Federal Government into our lives.
justbob, "Actually Insurance companies earn about a 5% return on their investments." Really? Source please.
justbob, I'll toss you a few sources...
http://aol.theonlineinvestor.com/stock_r...
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/f...
Here's one to dispute your next claim that the healthcare industry doesn't make a decent profit either.
http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/stock_r...
1) State High Risk Pools---at what cost? who is paying for this coverage? cost will not decrease in this pool as adverse selection will be taking place
2) Tort Reform --How do you plan to assure quality health-care? With tort reform there will be even less motivation to spend enough time with a patient to provide adequate care.
3) Affordable Health Insurance for Small Businesses--this is not a "new" concept, currently taking place.
4) Real Insurance Competition--Sorry, but the ball will still be in the insurance company's hands. No one can force a company to sell their product where they feel it is unprofitable.
5) Revamped Health Savings Accounts--problem is not with the health savings accounts, the problem lies with insurance and health-care cost being too high.
Focus needs to be on reducing the cost of insurance and health-care industry. As stated this represents a huge chunk of our economy, yet for some reason these two industry's inflation has out-paced 3-4 fold the rest of our economy.
Tiger Pride,
Your sources are talking about profits as percents of revenues while I was talking about return on investments. Never said they don't make money, just pointing out that I don't think they make "obscene" amounts based on ROI.