|
Post comment
Republican Jason Crowell works to hold on to Missouri state Senate seatThursday, October 30, 2008
PDF: Linda Sanders October quarterly report (149 kilobytes)
PDF: Crowell 8 days before election finance report (146 kilobytes) Since winning a legislative seat in 2000 with 58 percent of the vote, Jason Crowell has barely broken a sweat as he moved to re-election in 2002 and to the Senate in 2004. But after news reports in February 2006 revealed that Crowell had paid his close friend House Speaker Rod Jetton of Marble Hill more than $30,000 for political consulting during the 2004 election and beyond, there was grumbling among top area Republicans who wanted someone to mount a primary challenge. But as time passed and potential candidates declined to take on the race, Crowell was able to solidify his hold on the Senate seat. On Tuesday, voters will decide whether to give Crowell, who has increased his payments to Jetton this year to $4,500 a month, a second and final term in the Senate. He is being challenged by Linda Sanders of Jackson, a longtime Democratic activist who jumped into the race when Ellen Dillon, who originally planned to run, stepped aside because of Southeast Missouri State University rules against seeking full-time office. Dillon is an instructor with the university's Department of Communication. Crowell and Jetton's business relationship, while not illegal, doesn't seem right, Sanders said. "It seems like an awful lot of money going to Rod Jetton." In an interview, Crowell said he has matured during his eight-year tenure in the Missouri Legislature. "The thing is, when I first got elected, I truly was convinced that all Republicans were good and all Democrats were evil. I was way, way too partisan. Now my best friends in the Missouri Senate are Democrats, while my toughest opponents have been Republicans, people who have recruited primary opponents against me, people who have used newspapers against me." Sanders' challenge While Crowell said he has grown less partisan, Sanders said he must be called to account for Republican policies that have slashed more than 100,000 people from Missouri's Medicaid rolls and cut services to 300,000 more. Those cuts were enacted in 2005 as part of a budget reduction plan pushed by Gov. Matt Blunt, a Republican who relied on GOP control of the legislature to reach his goals. Sanders, who has raised less than $6,500 for her campaign compared to almost $500,000 for Crowell, knows defeating the Cape Girardeau Republican is a daunting challenge. But she said attitudes are changing as voters see their savings evaporate in the stock market crash and worry about their jobs. "They want somebody to work for them, somebody who will listen to them," she said. "I am the person who will take care of all the people." Sanders, a widow, said she learned from taking care of her five children how to take care of people. "What does he know about what families need?" she said. "He hasn't experienced that." Crowell's positions Crowell has always been a low-tax, pro-business Republican. He has said over the years that keeping taxes low does more to help families and promote business than government programs. While he doesn't support restoring the Medicaid cuts, he said he sees a lot to like in U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's health-care plan, which would allow Americans to buy into the health insurance provided to federal workers. He wants to do the same thing in Missouri on a smaller scale. The state runs a program called the Consolidated Health Care Plan. It allows local governments to purchase insurance on the state contract. But he wants to bring all state employees into the program — some agencies have separate plans — and open it up to businesses and individuals. "We must measure our compassion and outcomes on access to quality health care," Crowell said. Crowell has won praise from groups concerned with special needs children for his commitment to autism outreach and treatment, including a recent award from the Autism Society of America, Gateway Chapter. He has secured funding for the Tailor Institute and the Southeast Missouri Autism Center. It began when a friend had a child diagnosed with autism and his effort grew as he learned more, Crowell said. "I didn't find autism," he said. "Autism found me." The main complaint she has with Crowell, Sanders said, is his close relationship with lobbyists. A large percentage of his campaign funds are in the form of large donations from groups with business before the legislature. The senator "needs to represent all the people and not just some of the people, not just the special interests and the lobbyists," she said. "I feel that is going on. Businesses own the government." rkeller@semissourian.com 388-3642 Related Links
Comments The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, use the exclamation point icon beside the comment to send a report to the webmaster.
Respond to this story You are not logged in. Please login or create an account.
|
Headlines
Most viewed
Yesterday's most read news stories
Last week's most read news stories
Most discussed
Yesterday's most discussed
Last week's most discussed
advertisement
National News
|
Jason certainly doesn't represent our area. He has lied to us and danced to the tune of anyone that slipped a dime in his pocket. I've voted for the man in the past, but I won't make the same mistake again.
Jason Crowell lied to me about the Republican bill that passed in 2004 that would place water meters on rural family water wells. The folks in the western part of the state raised such a stink, got their Republican Senator, Chuck Purgason in and reemed him out but good. Purgason takes the law back into the legislature in 2005, the Republicans re-do it, and make it for the southwestern counties.
I asked Crowell, why they did that, instead of just killing the water meter plan, completely. He told me that the southwestern counties, WANTED THIS WATER METER BILL. I knew that was crapola because I grew up in a rural southern Missouri county, and we wouldn't have wanted any such thing on our farm.
Property Rights groups formed in the western counties. The ONLY thing that the Republicans did right was, when they changed the water meter law in 2005, they put in there that IF...IF a county commission wanted to hold an election on the matter for their county, they COULD... they were no required to do so.
In EVERY county which was allowed to hold an election on the water meter bill for their county, they have voted it OUT by about 92-98%.
I would not trust Jason Crowell and Rod Jetton, and,now, his puppet, Keeney, with a dime of our money, nor, an ounce of our freedoms.
I have met Linda Sanders. She is sincere, intelligent, and will work hard for us and see that we are represented, not ripped off.
Let me offer this advise to all those who he claims to represent! If by some chance he is re-elected, it will not be by my vote...either way, let's make it our promise to ourselves and to our children to keep a closer eye on him, call his hand on issues and question his voting!!!
It's too bad we couldn't find someone to challenge him in the primary.
Franlky speaking,
I can't understand how he was ever elected in the first place!
Lets hope he is defeated Tuesday!
It doesn't take that much effort to see what side of the interest group this guy represents! He claims to be for the common Joe the Plumber...look who was one of the Co-Sponsors for on the 2005 Work Comp Reform that was passed! There is absolutely no way that someone who claims to represent the working people should be able to sleep at night! His action was solely on the side to increase the power and line the pockets of businesses and throw worker's injuried on the job to the wayside like a useless piece of waste! Maybe if he had to experience life as those of us who have had to suffer from his voting actions, then he might not be so eager to take that golden spoon out of his mouth and feel some REAL compassion for people! If he were so concerned about real people, you would think that he could find something better to spend all that money that he sends to Mr. Jetton...who's pockets are so full that they drag the ground. The sad part of this comment is...I originally voted for both of these men, but never again!!!