Login | Register
[SeMissourian.com]
Print Email link Respond to editor Post comment Share link

Steven Julian acquitted of involuntary manslaughter in Feb. 14 shooting

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

(Photo)
Steven Julian was charged with involuntary manslaughter in the death of Zachary Snyder. On Tuesday, Julian was acquitted of the charge. (AARON EISENHAUER ~ aeisenhauer@semissourian.com ) [Order this photo]

PDF: Interview between Steve Julian and Cape Girardeau police the night of the shooting. (13 megabytes)

FULTON, Mo. — When a Callaway County jury issued a not-guilty verdict Tuesday on whether Steven R. Julian committed involuntary manslaughter in shooting and killing a parole jumper while trying to cuff him, Julian's family members and co-workers breathed a single, audible gasp.

Across the aisle of the cavernous courtroom, Edith Snyder, mother of 23-year-old victim Zachary Snyder, sat in silence, a hand clasped to her mouth, eyes lowered, before hurrying out of the courtroom.

Throughout the trial, Edith Snyder clutched a blue binder filled with memories or her son, compiled in February by his classmates.

While Julian, a fugitive recovery agent, declined to comment on the verdict following the two-day trial, his attorney, Steven Wilson, said his client wanted Snyder's family to know he is sorry for their loss.

After hearing testimony from 13 witnesses, including Julian, who took the stand for just over an hour, it took the jury 44 minutes to reach a decision.

"I felt if it was a short deliberation it would be an acquittal," said Cape Girardeau County Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle.

Swingle said he knew it would be a tough job deciding whether Julian acted in self-defense when he shot Snyder in the back after the other man made a sudden jerking motion.

"That's why we have juries to make those hard decisions," he said.

Julian testified earlier Tuesday that when he pulled his dark green Alero into the parking lot of a Cape Girardeau apartment complex Feb. 14, two dull porchlights at 2857 Themis St. illuminated Snyder's 5-foot-5-inch frame, shrouded in a long red and white striped shirt and baggy khakis. He seemed to be jabbing his index finger angrily at two people on the front steps of the apartment building, and his jaw moved as if he were yelling, Julian testified.

When he parked his car, he stepped out with his gun drawn and raised because he was there to arrest Snyder on a parole warrant related to a past conviction for "drug dealing," he was without backup, Snyder was already in an agitated state, and darkness had fallen over what he thought to be a high-crime area, he testified.

"There were a lot of shadows," he said.

Julian, who had worked within the Missouri Department of Corrections as a prison investigator for several years before joining the fugitive apprehension team in 2006, testified he'd made arrests without backup before but that he'd also had to draw his gun on a number of occasions.

Julian instructed Snyder to place his hands on the car but couldn't get a look at his left hand to see whether he had a weapon.

Then, using the back of the car as a springboard, Snyder spun to the right, and Julian reacted, sliding his finger from the trigger guard where it had gone when he'd prepared to holster his weapon and firing, striking Julian in the back just under the shoulder blade.

"This all happened that quick," Julian said, snapping his fingers.

"I never saw his left hand, not once," he testified.

Scott County deputy Tom Beardslee testified that as an assistant coordinator at the Southeast Missouri State University Law Enforcement Academy, he taught students to always make sure both of the subject's hands were visible and under control when making an arrest.

Beardslee also testified that it's the subject being arrested whose actions determine the level of force being used.

At 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, Cape Girardeau detective Tracy Lemonds testified that three calls were made to dispatch alerting them that Snyder was in the area and that an officer requested backup.

Leslie Tyler, a friend and occasional roommate of Snyder, testified Monday that he and Snyder had not been arguing when Julian arrived but that he'd called 911 because he didn't want to get in trouble for harboring a fugitive.

At a coroner's inquest in February, Julian's testimony didn't mention that he'd begun to holster his gun when Snyder jumped, an inconsistency Swingle highlighted in his closing argument.

What the jury didn't know, Wilson said, was that Snyder had four assaults on his record in addition to the conviction for possession of a controlled substance related to methamphetamine and stealing a car. The information was not admitted because Julian hadn't known about the assaults at the time, Wilson said.

Since the shooting, custody of Julian's former fugitive apprehension unit has been transferred to the Missouri State Highway Patrol, but Wilson said his understanding is that Julian may be given another job in the Department of Corrections.

"He's anxious to get back to work," Wilson said.

bdicosmo@semissourian.com

335-6611, extension 245


Related Links


Comments
The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, use the exclamation point icon beside the comment to send a report to the webmaster.

ChaffeeMP, a bad part of town? What the heck is your definition of bad part of town? Just because they wear tattoos or something like that? This shooting was unjustified and resulted in the death of an unarmed individual. How can he not ever see his left hand if he was making an arrest?? I don't know how Julian can sleep at night. He said he has had to draw his weapon several times in his career - sounds overzealous to me. That weapon is for last resort use only. I think Julian has been watching too many police and detective shows on TV.

-- Posted by Beaker on Thu, Oct 2, 2008, 10:26 am CDT

Julian was not found innocent of killing this young man as there was never a doubt or hint of denial. He was found innocent of doing so outside the legal boundaries of his position. Far easier to justify, in my mind, than abortion - which we just continue to let happen.

-- Posted by malan on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 6:54 pm CDT

My 2 Cents,

That is the most convoluted nonsense I have heard in a long time. So if a person is found guilty, he may not be guilty and if someone is found not guilty, he may be guilty ergo because Julian was found not guilty he is guilty...

The criminal justice system may not be perfect, but it is what we have and what we must live with or go to mob rule or anarchy which you seem to embrace.

-- Posted by Black_Shadow on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 6:33 pm CDT

This man was found not guilty after less than an hour of deliberation. Two days of testimony and it took less than an hour to figure this out, it's not like he walked up and shot a man, he was out there to arrest him on a parole violation. Last I knew parolees weren't on the safe list of non crime committing folks in the first place. Just because someone thinks a person is a jerk doesn't mean he deserves to be found guilty.

-- Posted by stylemeone1 on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 5:40 pm CDT

Just because someone is found "not guilty" of a crime by a jury, doesn't mean he wasn't still wrong for what he did. People are convicted of crimes all the time for something they didn't doand it takes 20 years for people to realize it and people who really did commit crimes are found "not guilty" & allowed to walk out of the courtroom a free man while the family suffers.

-- Posted by My_2_Cents on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 4:24 pm CDT

Not guilty-maybe this will send a message to other thug wanabes.
If you do a crime and run, the consequences may be injury or loss of life.

-- Posted by Smartblonde on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 4:03 pm CDT

Mamaw,

This individual’s personality is irrelevant. One can be a “jerk” and still be innocent of criminal charges and one can also be a “nice guy” and be guilty of a crime. The bottom line is that a jury spent two days hearing testimony from prosecution and defense witnesses and it took them less than an hour to find him not guilty. It does not appear as though this was a difficult decision for them to make. It does not matter what you or I might think, he has been found not guilty and that should be the end of it. You ALWAYS comply with a Law Enforcement Officer even if you are one also or even if you think they are in the wrong. Resisting arrest is a crime as is failure to follow the reasonable request of a LEO. If you want to file a complaint later on, by all means do so, but at the time you are stopped COMPLY FULLY.

-- Posted by Red_Rhino on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 9:27 am CDT

I think the Jury spoke volumes. Apparently after hearing testimony for two days, they feel he is innocent. It is unfortuante that a young man died, but he knew he was in violation and was going back or he wouldn't have been trying to "see his kids for one last time." They all have something to do for one last time. Why run, poor decision on his part, but not one he can change now. This guy will have to live with this shooting for the rest of his life and he was doing a job.

-- Posted by Breezy on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 8:57 am CDT

I think the Jury spoke volumes. Apparently after hearing testimony for two days, they feel he is innocent. It is unfortuante that a young man died, but he knew he was in violation and was going back or he wouldn't have been trying to "see his kids for one last time." They all have something to do for one last time. Why run, poor decision on his part, but not one he can change now. This guy will have to live with this shooting for the rest of his life and he was doing a job.

-- Posted by Breezy on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 8:57 am CDT

Let's not forget this guy was out on parol.A convicted drug dealer with a history of assaults.He failed to meet his release requirements.So his release was revoked.Is this the kind of person we want running our streets? I Don't know about the drugs, But I don't like to see violence on our steets.Remember police officers and corrections officer are here to protect and serve the community.The guy made a agressive move at night. Sounds pretty stupid to me.If a cop tells me to do something I'm not going argue or run. What's wrong with this picture.If you don't follow the rules you suffer the consequences.

-- Posted by energizer on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 8:53 am CDT

I am in law enforcement myself. Believe me, if you feel that your life is threatened, you have all the right in the world to protect yourself. This was a criminal, and he was in a bad part of town. I would have done the same thing. It is sad that the guy died, but he should have been compliant.

-- Posted by ChaffeeMP on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 8:52 am CDT

He was accused, charged, tried, and a jury found him to be within his legal boundaries. How can you say he "got by" with anything?

-- Posted by malan on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 8:21 am CDT

I cannot believe that he KILLS a man, who is unarmed and gets by with it. This guy is a jerk for those of you who do not know him. (By the way I have never been in trouble with the law) My children worked with him on two separate occasions. I heard about him before this happened.

-- Posted by mawmaw on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 6:32 am CDT

JustSomeone: The man did not do anything wrong. a jury of his PEERS said he did not do anything wrong. There was no crime. He is innocent.

-- Posted by JackTorrance on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 6:15 am CDT

Some day he will have to answer to God for his actions and he better hope that God is as merciful on him as this jury.

"An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" - Martin Luther King Jr.

-- Posted by JustSomeone on Wed, Oct 1, 2008, 2:18 am CDT



Respond to this story

You are not logged in. Please login or create an account.

Most discussed
Yesterday's most discussed
Last week's most discussed
    The conversion of a varchar data type to a smalldatetime data type resulted in an out-of-range value.
advertisement
National News