Login | Register
[SeMissourian.com]
Print Email link Respond to editor Post comment

More trouble apparently brewing at SEMO

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

As if the SEMO athletics department didn’t have enough problems, now comes even more.

Tuesday’s announcement that the NCAA again is investigating the SEMO athletics program — this time following up on new information relating to the men’s basketball program — was stunning to say the least.

Sources have told me that the latest NCAA probe centers around the men’s basketball program under current coach Scott Edgar, who took over after Gary Garner’s contract was not renewed following the 2005-06 season.

I especially point that out because at least one media report seemed to indicate the probe was to try and gather further information regarding the NCAA violations committed under Garner.

From what I’ve heard, that’s not the case. Also not the case, from what I’ve heard, is that this latest probe basically resulted from Garner contesting that the violations committed under his watch were major. I don’t think that had anything to do with it.

The letter SEMO received from the NCAA, which was made public Tuesday, said information that was developed between April, when university officials made an appearance before the NCAA Committee on Infractions, and June, when the committee released its report on the previous infractions, led to the new investigation.

That report concluded a 29-month process that began with allegations about the women’s basketball program, led to the finding of numerous violations under former coach B.J. Smith and also led to several penalties, including taking away the Redhawks’ two OVC championships in 2005-06 that resulted in the program’s first NCAA Division I tournament appearance.

The investigation also included violations in the men’s program under former coach Garner centering around the 2004-05 and 2005-06 seasons.

Those violations involved the university’s payment of travel costs for three players who had transferred and were not eligible to compete, but were permitted by Garner to travel to away games during that two-year period.

SEMO paid a fine of approximately $12,600, double the amount of the costs paid for the athletes to travel, under a recommended self-imposed sanction.

Tuesday’s release from SEMO said the university, in addition to receiving a letter informing it of the latest investigation, also received a letter containing a case study of the men’s basketball investigation under Garner’s watch because Garner is disputing the NCAA Committee on Infractions’ ruling that it was a major infraction.

But, like I wrote earlier, I don’t think Garner’s disputing the ruling about his violations being major had anything to do with starting this latest probe.

As to what the NCAA might uncover, your guess is as good as mine because SEMO and NCAA officials say they won’t comment on an ongoing NCAA investigation.

The NCAA said in its letter that it hopes to complete the investigation by the fall, although considering how long the women’s basketball probe took, I wouldn’t count on it.

But regardless, it should definitely be a few interesting months.


Comments
The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, use the exclamation point icon beside the comment to send a report to the webmaster.

I hate soccer, and now have a valid reason to.

-- Posted by semoredhawks on Fri, Aug 22, 2008, 2:27 pm CDT

the ncaa has only ever handed out one "death penalty." if there is in fact a major violation in this case - it will not be eligible for a death penalty as it was discovered before the other penalty was handed out.

-- Posted by silencedogood on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, 9:19 am CDT

An institution shall be considered a "repeat" violator if the Committee on Infractions finds that a major violation has occurred within five years of the starting date of a major penalty. For this provision to apply, at least one major violation must have occurred within five years after the starting date of the penalties in the previous case. It shall not be necessary that the Committee on Infractions' hearing be conducted or its report issued within the five-year period. (Revised: 1/14/97 effective 8/1/97)

In addition to the penalties identified for a major violation, the minimum penalty for a repeat violator, subject to exceptions authorized by the Committee on Infractions on the basis of specifically stated reasons, may include any or all of the following: (Revised: 1/11/94)

(a) The prohibition of some or all outside competition in the sport involved in the latest major violation for one or two sports seasons and the prohibition of all coaching staff members in that sport from involvement directly or indirectly in any coaching activities at the institution during that period;

(b) The elimination of all initial grants-in-aid and all recruiting activities in the sport involved in the latest major violation in question for a two-year period;

(c) The requirement that all institutional staff members serving on the Board of Directors, Leadership Council, Legislative Committee or other cabinets or committees of the Association resign those positions, it being understood that all institutional representatives shall be ineligible to serve on any NCAA committee for a period of four years; and (Revised: 11/1/07 effective 8/1/08)

(d) The requirement that the institution relinquish its voting privilege in the Association for a four-year period

-- Posted by semoredhawks on Thu, Aug 14, 2008, 9:11 am CDT

It has been a few years since the NCAA has handed out a "death penalty" in men's basketball. They like to do that every now and then to show everyone what they are capable of. With the repeat offenses and lack of institutional control, this all sounds scary to me.

-- Posted by hooopsguru on Thu, Aug 14, 2008, 8:56 am CDT

Well, at least if the men have to vacate wins: "no big deal"

-- Posted by Larry Doby on Thu, Aug 14, 2008, 8:45 am CDT

Someone should check out what recommended punishments by the NCAA are for repeat offenders, which Semo will be classified as most likely.

Oh well, at the least this truly signifies a beginning to the end.

-- Posted by boomerang on Thu, Aug 14, 2008, 8:31 am CDT

I never heard about Garner being in any type of NCAA trouble at Drake. His rep has been pretty clean over the years, as far as I know.

But like I wrote, I don't think this new stuff has anything to do with Garner.

-- Posted by Marty Mishow on Wed, Aug 13, 2008, 11:54 pm CDT

There were rumors that he was, but I don't think this current case has much to do about Garner.

-- Posted by iffythedopster on Wed, Aug 13, 2008, 11:07 pm CDT

Wow, this is starting to get out of hand. What a joke.

-- Posted by JoeRaiders on Wed, Aug 13, 2008, 9:51 pm CDT

Does anyone know if Garner was in trouble at Drake??

-- Posted by ThisisRCIR on Wed, Aug 13, 2008, 9:13 pm CDT



Respond to this story

You are not logged in. Please login or create an account.

The Latest Line
Marty Mishow
advertisement