|
|
Post comment
SEMO pay raises, public vs. private schoolsFriday, July 11, 2008
I've gotten a few questions about faculty pay raises at Southeast Missouri State University. On Wednesday I reported the Board of Regents approved a budget that included a 3.25 percent pay raise for faculty and staff. The 3.25 raise is an average for all faculty. It includes raises associated with promotions. Out of the 3.25 average raise, 75 percent of it went to a base raise and 25 percent went to promotions. That means regular faculty members received a 2.44 percent raise. The remaining .81 percent was spent on promoting about 60 faculty members. Promotions, such as raising from assistant professor to professor, range from $5,000 to $7,900. Here is a list of people who received promotions. The university employs over 400 full-time faculty members, which means a majority of faculty will only receive the 2.44 percent raise. Thank you, readers, for pointing this out. And thanks to Mona Hughey, budget office director, for providing me clarification.
I need your help! With things slowing down for the summer, I'm working on some longer trend stories. I'm interested in finding any Cape Girardeau or Jackson residents that switched from public school to private school or home schooling recently. Please call me at 573-335-6611 ext. 123 or email me at lbavolek@semissourian.com if this pertains to you.
Vacation I'll be out of the office the next week, returning July 21. Please direct questions to Managing Editor Bob Miller. He can be reached at bmiller@semissourian.com.
Untelevised work sessions? A leftover item from the Cape Girardeau School Board retreat on Wednesday. I'll be interested to see how this progresses: Some Cape Girardeau School Board members want to change the way they run their meetings. They are proposing holding an untelevised work session an hour before their regular session. Stacy Kinder suggested the idea at a school board retreat Wednesday. She said the open work session would allow administrators to answer questions or explain items more fully before members vote. Usually a couple of days before each meeting members are given a packet of information. The packet contains information they may need time to study to make an informed vote. Currently, if members have a question or want more information, they individually call an administrator. Kinder asked staff Wednesday if they get tired of separately answering the same questions. She said it might help administrators if they could answer all the questions at once. Kyle McDonald, board president, asked "what would you be able to discuss in a study session you wouldn't do during a regular meeting?" Laura Sparkman replied, "It wouldn't be televised." She also said later that parliamentary procedure would not have to be followed. The meeting would still be open to the public, Dr. Steve Trautwein said. It would be "more relaxed," Tony Smee said. The work session is not definite; it was only a suggestion that will require further discussion. Readers: what do you think of the idea? Other stories about the retreat: School officials again seek long-term plan Board spars over renaming of Alternative Education Center
Comments The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, use the exclamation point icon beside the comment to send a report to the webmaster.
Respond to this storyYou are not logged in. Please login or create an account.
|
Lindy Bavolek, a former teacher, is the education reporter for the Southeast Missourian.
She grew up in Chicago and Dallas and is trained in both journalism and education. Past jobs include working as an intern at the Dallas Morning News and the London business magazine Retail Week. Lindy previously taught second grade in a high-needs school in Saint Louis. First day of school (August 14, 2008) SEMO makes Princeton Review list (August 13, 2008) Your MAP Headquarters (August 1, 2008) The top-paying jobs for graduates (July 25, 2008) SEMO pay raises, public vs. private schools (July 11, 2008) advertisement
|
What about TEACHERS who have switched from private to public or visa versa? What slant are you taking on this? What about students who have seen both sides, public vs. private? I could load you up on opinions here.
Duh, what an appropriate name.
The meetings aren't televised AT ALL in the summertime (because the students, who tape the meetings, aren't in school), I wonder what evil the board is concocting during that period of time, huh?
The study meetings will still be public, they just won't be televised! Our city council has been doing this for years. ******* your lazy arse and go SEE what's going on!
This school board will apparently never learn. Now they want to meet away from the TV cameras. What is the public supposed to think? It's not like this board has a lot of credibility left, and then along comes this hairbrained idea. What are they thinking?
How about families that have switched from private to public??